Walter E Washington Convention Center - Washington D.C, DC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LING Eddie | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
2 | QIAN Jason H. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
3 | LIN Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
3 | TAN Aidan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
5 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
6 | CO Dylan | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% | |
7 | YAO Bradley | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
8 | LI Matthew | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 40% |
9 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
10 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
11 | PARK Rion | - | - | 3% | 23% | 53% | 21% | |
12 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% |
13 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
14 | LI Bradley | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
15 | CHENG Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
16 | ZHANG Jacob | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
17 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
18 | LEE Brendan | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
19 | LIU Ethan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
20 | LEE Jonah | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
21 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | - | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
22 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
23 | LIN James G. | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% | |
24 | LI Toby | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
25 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
26 | XU Ethan | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
27 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | - | 7% | 40% | 52% | |
27 | HUANG Jonathan | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
29 | BLACK Zachary | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | - | |
30 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
31 | WONG Yuheng Isaac | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
32 | PRUT Anton | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
33 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 6% |
34 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
35 | LI Samuel | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
36 | LE Jacob H. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
37 | GUTH Joseph | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
38 | LIU William | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
39 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
40 | WU Alistair | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
41 | SHENG Dalton | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
42 | JIANG Bowang | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
42 | SHAPIRO Leon | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
44 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
45 | CHO Xzander | 1% | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
46 | DOELL Ethan | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
47 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
48 | CHUANG Oscar | 1% | 13% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
49 | JURMAN Therin | 1% | 12% | 43% | 36% | 8% | - | |
50 | WONG Evan | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
51 | FENG Michael | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 1% | |
52 | HUANG Eythan | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | |
53 | PARRISH Evan | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
54 | YANG Dylan | - | 8% | 36% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
55 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
56 | CHEN Ethan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
57 | WONG Jackson | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
58 | MAO Lucas | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
59 | LIU Derek | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
60 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 36% | 8% |
61 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | 30% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
62 | BI Ryan | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
63 | ARIZA Abraham J. | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
64 | SHANNON Jack | - | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
65 | LI Aaron | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
66 | BAE Eugene | - | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
67 | VADEN Oliver | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 4% |
68 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
69 | SONG Noel | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
70 | CHEN Hanson | - | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
71 | MARTIN Darius | - | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
72 | KIM Brian | - | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
73 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
74 | TANG August L. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
75 | TANG Terry | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 4% | |
76 | TANG Alexander L. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% | |
77 | BAI Brian | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
78 | LU Jingyi | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
79 | BORKOWSKI Olgierd | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
80 | ZHAO Nathan | - | 1% | 15% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
81 | ZHAO Adam | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
81 | WANG Brian | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 7% |
83 | MARTIN Mason | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
84 | LEE Eugene | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
85 | STRINGER David | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
85 | ZAIDI Adil | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
87 | WANDJI Noah | - | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
88 | RAJ Jay | - | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
89 | CROOM Tucker | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
90 | LU Nathan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
91 | SUN Henry | 3% | 22% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
92 | XU Joseph | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
93 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 21% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
94 | ZHAO Brian | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
95 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% | |
96 | GE Felix Fei | 1% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
97 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - | |
98 | COPELAND Nigel | 2% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
99 | PAN Ethan | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
100 | HOLLIS Sean | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
101 | SUN Ryan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
102 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
103 | SENANI Arjun | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
104 | XU Brian | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
105 | YU William | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
106 | ANWEILER Nathan | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
107 | SURESH Rohan | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
108 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 1% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | - | |
109 | GUO Justin | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
110 | BAI Austin | 13% | 47% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
111 | PERLMAN Taiyo | 11% | 52% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
112 | XIE Buster | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
113 | HUA Aaron | 1% | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
114 | POWELL Sean | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
115 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
116 | HE Kyle | 5% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
117 | TOOMRE Kai | 2% | 30% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
118 | ZOU Michael | 25% | 52% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
119 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 17% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
120 | SHAW Spencer | 11% | 54% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
121 | HOWLAND Jonas | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
122 | TAM Kyle | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
123 | PAZ Luis | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
124 | MCKEE Calvin | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
125 | KRZYWON Dylan | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
126 | DHANOA Kian | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
127 | CHEN Antony | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
128 | ZMUDA Aiden | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
129 | PLUMMER Waylon | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
130 | CHANG Zane | 71% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
131 | TOEWS Jackson | 36% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
132 | SEMP Iain | < 1% | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
133 | MARC Josiah | 46% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
134 | OEHLER Mac | 99% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
135 | SCHULTZ Oliver | 76% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
135 | CHANG Xavier | 70% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
137 | ROMERO Dante | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
138 | NAUGHTON Aidan | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
139 | KIM Richard | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.