Walter E Washington Convention Center - Washington D.C, DC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LING Eddie | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 2 | QIAN Jason H. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | LIN Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 3 | TAN Aidan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 5 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
| 6 | CO Dylan | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% | |
| 7 | YAO Bradley | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 8 | LI Matthew | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 40% |
| 9 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 10 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
| 11 | PARK Rion | - | - | 3% | 23% | 53% | 21% | |
| 12 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% |
| 13 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | LI Bradley | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 15 | CHENG Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 16 | ZHANG Jacob | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
| 17 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 18 | LEE Brendan | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 19 | LIU Ethan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 20 | LEE Jonah | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 21 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | - | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 23 | LIN James G. | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% | |
| 24 | LI Toby | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 25 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | XU Ethan | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | - | 7% | 40% | 52% | |
| 27 | HUANG Jonathan | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 29 | BLACK Zachary | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | - | |
| 30 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 31 | WONG Yuheng Isaac | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | PRUT Anton | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 6% |
| 34 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
| 35 | LI Samuel | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 36 | LE Jacob H. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 37 | GUTH Joseph | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 38 | LIU William | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 39 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 40 | WU Alistair | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 41 | SHENG Dalton | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 42 | JIANG Bowang | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 42 | SHAPIRO Leon | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 44 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 45 | CHO Xzander | 1% | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 46 | DOELL Ethan | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 47 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
| 48 | CHUANG Oscar | 1% | 13% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 49 | JURMAN Therin | 1% | 12% | 43% | 36% | 8% | - | |
| 50 | WONG Evan | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 51 | FENG Michael | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 1% | |
| 52 | HUANG Eythan | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | |
| 53 | PARRISH Evan | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 54 | YANG Dylan | - | 8% | 36% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 55 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
| 56 | CHEN Ethan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 57 | WONG Jackson | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 58 | MAO Lucas | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
| 59 | LIU Derek | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 60 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 36% | 8% |
| 61 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | 30% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 62 | BI Ryan | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 63 | ARIZA Abraham J. | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 64 | SHANNON Jack | - | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 65 | LI Aaron | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 66 | BAE Eugene | - | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 67 | VADEN Oliver | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 4% |
| 68 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 69 | SONG Noel | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 70 | CHEN Hanson | - | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 71 | MARTIN Darius | - | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 72 | KIM Brian | - | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 73 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 74 | TANG August L. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 75 | TANG Terry | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 4% | |
| 76 | TANG Alexander L. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% | |
| 77 | BAI Brian | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 78 | LU Jingyi | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | BORKOWSKI Olgierd | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 80 | ZHAO Nathan | - | 1% | 15% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 81 | ZHAO Adam | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 81 | WANG Brian | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 7% |
| 83 | MARTIN Mason | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 84 | LEE Eugene | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 85 | STRINGER David | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 85 | ZAIDI Adil | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 87 | WANDJI Noah | - | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 88 | RAJ Jay | - | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 89 | CROOM Tucker | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 90 | LU Nathan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 91 | SUN Henry | 3% | 22% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 92 | XU Joseph | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 93 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 21% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | ZHAO Brian | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 95 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% | |
| 96 | GE Felix Fei | 1% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 97 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - | |
| 98 | COPELAND Nigel | 2% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 99 | PAN Ethan | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 100 | HOLLIS Sean | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 101 | SUN Ryan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 102 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 103 | SENANI Arjun | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 104 | XU Brian | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 105 | YU William | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 106 | ANWEILER Nathan | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 107 | SURESH Rohan | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 108 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 1% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 109 | GUO Justin | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 110 | BAI Austin | 13% | 47% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 111 | PERLMAN Taiyo | 11% | 52% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
| 112 | XIE Buster | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 113 | HUA Aaron | 1% | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 114 | POWELL Sean | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 115 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 116 | HE Kyle | 5% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 117 | TOOMRE Kai | 2% | 30% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 118 | ZOU Michael | 25% | 52% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 119 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 17% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 120 | SHAW Spencer | 11% | 54% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | HOWLAND Jonas | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 122 | TAM Kyle | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 123 | PAZ Luis | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 124 | MCKEE Calvin | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 125 | KRZYWON Dylan | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 126 | DHANOA Kian | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 127 | CHEN Antony | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 128 | ZMUDA Aiden | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 129 | PLUMMER Waylon | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 130 | CHANG Zane | 71% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 131 | TOEWS Jackson | 36% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 132 | SEMP Iain | < 1% | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 133 | MARC Josiah | 46% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 134 | OEHLER Mac | 99% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 135 | SCHULTZ Oliver | 76% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 135 | CHANG Xavier | 70% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 137 | ROMERO Dante | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 138 | NAUGHTON Aidan | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 139 | KIM Richard | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.