March SJCC

Cadet Men's Foil

Saturday, March 16, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Walter E Washington Convention Center - Washington D.C, DC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LING Eddie 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 32%
2 QIAN Jason H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 55%
3 LIN Michael 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 51%
3 TAN Aidan 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 30% 6%
5 GUERRA Gabriel H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 55%
6 CO Dylan 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
7 YAO Bradley 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 13%
8 LI Matthew 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 40%
9 DERRICK Blake 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 21%
10 SENIC Lucas 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 31%
11 PARK Rion 100% 100% 100% 97% 74% 21%
12 TRAUGOT Owen G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 53%
13 GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) 100% 100% 96% 76% 39% 10% 1%
14 LI Bradley 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 18%
15 CHENG Ethan 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 22%
16 ZHANG Jacob 100% 100% 99% 88% 55% 16%
17 CHEN Kyle P. 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 6%
18 LEE Brendan 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 27%
19 LIU Ethan 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 34% 7%
20 LEE Jonah 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19%
21 MAZAHERI Fletcher 100% 100% 89% 55% 20% 3% -
22 CORTRIGHT Skipper 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 27%
23 LIN James G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 74%
24 LI Toby 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 55% 16%
25 PARK Steve (Sangmin) 100% 100% 98% 81% 44% 13% 1%
26 XU Ethan 100% 100% 95% 70% 33% 8% 1%
27 WONG Garrick G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 52%
27 HUANG Jonathan 100% 100% 96% 76% 36% 7%
29 BLACK Zachary 100% 95% 74% 37% 9% -
30 KIM Daniel Y. 100% 100% 100% 94% 72% 34% 6%
31 WONG Yuheng Isaac 100% 97% 77% 40% 11% 1%
32 PRUT Anton 100% 70% 25% 4% - -
33 ZHEN Ethan 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 37% 6%
34 RASMUSSEN Sage 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 34%
35 LI Samuel 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 7%
36 LE Jacob H. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 31% 6%
37 GUTH Joseph 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 4%
38 LIU William 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 2%
39 DINSAY Kristjan 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 71% 28%
40 WU Alistair 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 5%
41 SHENG Dalton 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 23% 3%
42 JIANG Bowang 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
42 SHAPIRO Leon 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3%
44 XU Andy P. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 19%
45 CHO Xzander 100% 99% 88% 56% 22% 4% -
46 DOELL Ethan 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 18% 3%
47 AKYAMAC Bora 100% 100% 100% 94% 68% 22%
48 CHUANG Oscar 100% 99% 86% 47% 12% 1%
49 JURMAN Therin 100% 99% 87% 44% 8% -
50 WONG Evan 100% 98% 82% 46% 12% 1%
51 FENG Michael 100% 99% 88% 57% 19% 1%
52 HUANG Eythan 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 9%
53 PARRISH Evan 100% 100% 99% 93% 64% 20%
54 YANG Dylan 100% 100% 92% 56% 13% 1%
55 FUKUDA Diego 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 12%
56 CHEN Ethan 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 17% 2%
57 WONG Jackson 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 8%
58 MAO Lucas 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 26% 3%
59 LIU Derek 100% 100% 100% 95% 78% 42% 10%
60 CHOI Ethan 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 44% 8%
61 YIN Zixin(Gavin) 100% 70% 23% 3% - -
62 BI Ryan 100% 92% 65% 28% 6% -
63 ARIZA Abraham J. 100% 100% 97% 78% 42% 11% 1%
64 SHANNON Jack 100% 100% 68% 26% 5% - -
65 LI Aaron 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 13%
66 BAE Eugene 100% 100% 98% 80% 43% 11% 1%
67 VADEN Oliver 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 30% 4%
68 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas 100% 100% 97% 78% 38% 8%
69 SONG Noel 100% 100% 95% 76% 39% 9%
70 CHEN Hanson 100% 100% 100% 92% 66% 28% 5%
71 MARTIN Darius 100% 100% 98% 77% 39% 10% 1%
72 KIM Brian 100% 100% 98% 83% 50% 17% 2%
73 LIU Zixian (Aaron) 100% 100% 96% 72% 31% 5%
74 TANG August L. 100% 100% 99% 91% 60% 18%
75 TANG Terry 100% 100% 96% 73% 29% 4%
76 TANG Alexander L. 100% 99% 89% 61% 23% 2%
77 BAI Brian 100% 95% 69% 28% 5% -
78 LU Jingyi 100% 96% 73% 35% 8% 1% -
79 BORKOWSKI Olgierd 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 39% 8%
80 ZHAO Nathan 100% 100% 99% 84% 41% 9% 1%
81 ZHAO Adam 100% 100% 97% 79% 43% 12% 1%
81 WANG Brian 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 42% 7%
83 MARTIN Mason 100% 98% 84% 48% 15% 2% -
84 LEE Eugene 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 22% 3%
85 STRINGER David 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 38% 9%
85 ZAIDI Adil 100% 97% 78% 41% 12% 2% -
87 WANDJI Noah 100% 100% 95% 67% 28% 5% -
88 RAJ Jay 100% 100% 100% 93% 67% 27% 4%
89 CROOM Tucker 100% 97% 80% 43% 12% 1% -
90 LU Nathan 100% 99% 90% 59% 23% 4% -
91 SUN Henry 100% 97% 76% 27% 4% - -
92 XU Joseph 100% 65% 22% 4% - - -
93 TEH Tang-Ngu 100% 79% 33% 7% 1% - -
94 ZHAO Brian 100% 44% 9% 1% - -
95 SRINIVASAN Vedant 100% 98% 87% 54% 17% 1%
96 GE Felix Fei 100% 99% 78% 37% 9% 1%
97 BRAIZINHA Thomas 100% 94% 70% 32% 7% -
98 COPELAND Nigel 100% 98% 81% 38% 8% 1%
99 PAN Ethan 100% 87% 51% 16% 2% -
100 HOLLIS Sean 100% 81% 38% 9% 1% -
101 SUN Ryan 100% 97% 79% 43% 14% 2% -
102 JIMENEZ Naveen 100% 100% 87% 53% 18% 3% -
103 SENANI Arjun 100% 92% 58% 20% 4% - -
104 XU Brian 100% 64% 19% 3% - - -
105 YU William 100% 99% 86% 52% 17% 3% -
106 ANWEILER Nathan 100% 74% 32% 7% 1% -
107 SURESH Rohan 100% 85% 48% 15% 2% -
108 ZHANG GAVIN J 100% 99% 73% 30% 6% -
109 GUO Justin 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 12%
110 BAI Austin 100% 87% 40% 9% 1% -
111 PERLMAN Taiyo 100% 89% 37% 6% - -
112 XIE Buster 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 17% 2%
113 HUA Aaron 100% 99% 74% 33% 8% 1% -
114 POWELL Sean 100% 85% 45% 13% 2% - -
115 GADIYARAM Madhav 100% 58% 17% 3% - - -
116 HE Kyle 100% 95% 70% 30% 7% 1% -
117 TOOMRE Kai 100% 98% 68% 27% 6% 1% -
118 ZOU Michael 100% 75% 23% 2% - - -
119 ABRAMKIN Tim 100% 83% 24% 3% - - -
120 SHAW Spencer 100% 89% 35% 6% 1% - -
121 HOWLAND Jonas 100% 87% 48% 14% 2% - -
122 TAM Kyle 100% 91% 59% 22% 4% - -
123 PAZ Luis 100% 66% 22% 4% - - -
124 MCKEE Calvin 100% 82% 41% 11% 2% - -
125 KRZYWON Dylan 100% 46% 9% 1% - - -
126 DHANOA Kian 100% 71% 29% 6% - - -
127 CHEN Antony 100% 88% 48% 14% 2% - -
128 ZMUDA Aiden 100% 40% 6% - - -
129 PLUMMER Waylon 100% 74% 31% 7% 1% - -
130 CHANG Zane 100% 29% 3% - - -
131 TOEWS Jackson 100% 64% 16% 1% - -
132 SEMP Iain 100% 100% 94% 68% 28% 6% -
133 MARC Josiah 100% 54% 11% 1% - - -
134 OEHLER Mac 100% 1% - - - - -
135 SCHULTZ Oliver 100% 24% 1% - - - -
135 CHANG Xavier 100% 30% 2% - - - -
137 ROMERO Dante 100% 13% 1% - - -
138 NAUGHTON Aidan 100% 13% 1% - - - -
139 KIM Richard 100% 3% - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.