Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
2 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% |
3 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
3 | LU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
5 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
5 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% |
7 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 31% |
8 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 31% |
9 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
10 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
10 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 44% |
12 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
13 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
14 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% |
15 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | 10% |
16 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
17 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
18 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
19 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% |
20 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 6% |
21 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
22 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | 3% |
23 | LI Edison M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 3% |
24 | WANDJI Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
26 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 13% |
27 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
28 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% |
28 | PARK William | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - |
30 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
30 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
32 | CHONG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
33 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
34 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
35 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 18% |
36 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
37 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% | |
38 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 22% |
39 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
39 | WONG Braxton | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | - | |
41 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% |
42 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - |
43 | ONG Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
44 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
45 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
46 | NEICE William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 33% | 3% |
46 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
48 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
49 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
50 | PE Noah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
51 | LUK Trusten | 100% | 100% | 86% | 45% | 8% | - | - |
52 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% | 8% |
53 | LI Lucas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
54 | GUO Austin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
55 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
55 | WANG sicheng | 100% | 99% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
57 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
58 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
59 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
60 | CHENG Mason | 100% | 99% | 83% | 39% | 6% | - | - |
61 | YEE Colin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
62 | HE Ian | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
63 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
64 | YE Jerry | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
65 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | |
66 | FOY Grant | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
66 | ZHANG Jason | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
68 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
69 | CHAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
70 | ZHANG Raphael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
71 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
72 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
73 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
74 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
75 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
76 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 2% |
77 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
78 | HE Bourne | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
79 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 99% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
80 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
81 | CHEN Jason | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
82 | YUNG Brandon | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
83 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 7% |
84 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
85 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
86 | JACOB Ezra | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
87 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - | |
88 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - |
89 | YANG Aaron | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
90 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
91 | YANG Steve | 100% | 90% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
92 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
92 | LEE Abin | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
94 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
95 | LEE Mason | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
96 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
97 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 93% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
97 | ZHOU Huanyu | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
97 | LI Mercury | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
100 | OH Kepler | 100% | 95% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
101 | KARPMAN Benny | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
102 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
103 | KIM Andrew | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
104 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
105 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 100% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
106 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
107 | CHEUNG Henry | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
108 | DULAI Angad | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
109 | LEE Colin | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
110 | DACKO Nolan | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
111 | OLLILA Gideon | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
111 | SHADRAVAN Arash | 100% | 77% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
113 | SU Desmond | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
113 | HE Gary | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
113 | SHEN Alaric | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
113 | TRAN Matthew | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
117 | LEE Euan | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
118 | MAO Runxian | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
118 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
118 | WEI Winston | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
118 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 82% | 40% | 8% | - | - | - |
122 | KWONG Colin | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
122 | KUBBA Krish | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
122 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
125 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
126 | YANG Jerry | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.