DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SU Caleb | V D V V V | V V V V V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 2 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 3 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | ZHANG Caden | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 5 | CHEN Brian | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 6 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | CAO Brad | V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 8 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | D V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 9 | KIM kihyeon | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 11 | WHEELER Daniel | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | SWENSON Keane J. | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | CAO Albert | V V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | HE Lawrence | V D V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 16 | CARTER Austin L. | D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 18 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 19 | SOKOL Luke | D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 20 | YOO Dong Hun | V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 22 | TIKHONOV Daniel | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 23 | ZHANG Sen | D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 24 | EVANS Grant | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 25 | USDIN Anton | V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 26 | SO Lorenzo | V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 27 | JORDAN Anton | D D D D V V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 28 | EVANS Allen L. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | SEIKEL Spencer | V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 30 | HUGHES Michael D. | D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 31 | LEE Aiden | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 33 | YI Nathan | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 34 | ACKLAND Matthew | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 35 | HOOVER Natalie | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 36 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 37 | BJERKNESS Riley | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.