DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SU Caleb | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 2 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 3 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Caden | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 5 | CHEN Brian | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 6 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% | |
| 7 | CAO Brad | - | 11% | 37% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 8 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 50% | 18% | |
| 9 | KIM kihyeon | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 10 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 52% | |
| 11 | WHEELER Daniel | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 12 | SWENSON Keane J. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% | |
| 13 | CAO Albert | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 14 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 15 | HE Lawrence | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 16 | CARTER Austin L. | - | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 18 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 19 | SOKOL Luke | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | YOO Dong Hun | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 21 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 1% | 23% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | ZHANG Sen | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | EVANS Grant | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 25 | USDIN Anton | 2% | 29% | 44% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | SO Lorenzo | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | JORDAN Anton | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 28 | EVANS Allen L. | 4% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SEIKEL Spencer | 5% | 38% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | HUGHES Michael D. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 31 | LEE Aiden | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | YI Nathan | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 34 | ACKLAND Matthew | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | HOOVER Natalie | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | BJERKNESS Riley | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.