Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 2 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 3 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 3 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% |
| 5 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
| 6 | LIN Xilong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 7 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 7 | PONS Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 9 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
| 10 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 28% | |
| 11 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 12 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 13 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 14 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 15 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% |
| 16 | QIU Zhaocheng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% |
| 18 | KETTELLE John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
| 19 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 19 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% |
| 21 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 22 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 23 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 2% |
| 24 | SAH Steven | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% | |
| 25 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
| 26 | LU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 27 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
| 28 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 29 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
| 30 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 31 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
| 34 | XIE Buster | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 36 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 37 | PARK Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 38 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | 5% |
| 39 | OROPEZA David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 40 | FOY Grant | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
| 41 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 44 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 46 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 47 | CHONG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 49 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 50 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | NEICE William | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 52 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 53 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 56 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
| 59 | PETERSON Matthew | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 61 | BAKER Ethan | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% | |
| 63 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 64 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 90% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | ANWEILER Nathan | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | WONG Braxton | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 70 | ROSE Jacob W. | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 72 | ZHANG Raphael | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 73 | HE Bourne | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 74 | GRINER Kevin | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 75 | CAJERO Luis O. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 76 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | KUO Jayden | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 79 | CHENG Mason | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 80 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 82 | BECKER Ethan | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 100% | 80% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | BLAM Matthew | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | SMITH Jeremiah | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 86 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | MCCARVILL Cooper | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 88 | ROMAGOSA Leon | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | POUND Michael | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.