The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Fortune Fencing SYC /RJCC & Y8

Junior Men's Foil

Sunday, March 24, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - - - 4% 28% 67%
2 CANLAS Nathan - - - - 4% 29% 66%
3 ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) - - 4% 20% 38% 30% 8%
3 RASMUSSEN Sage - - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
5 LI Matthew - - 1% 9% 30% 42% 19%
6 LIN Xilong - - 1% 6% 24% 43% 26%
7 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - - - 3% 19% 43% 35%
7 PONS Diego - - 5% 22% 38% 27% 7%
9 MYERS Dean - - 1% 8% 28% 43% 20%
10 LEE Christopher T. - - 4% 22% 45% 28%
11 DINSAY Kristjan - - 1% 10% 31% 40% 19%
12 MORROW Brenden - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 10%
13 NGUYEN Martin - - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
14 RAUTUREAU Hugo - 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3%
15 WU Alber Y. - - 1% 9% 29% 40% 20%
16 QIU Zhaocheng - 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 1%
17 NICOLETTI Luca - - - 5% 22% 43% 30%
18 KETTELLE John - - 4% 18% 38% 32% 8%
19 WANG Ethan - - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
19 YI William - - 2% 14% 37% 35% 11%
21 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
22 LO Preston - - 2% 16% 36% 34% 11%
23 ZHANG Jacob - 1% 8% 27% 40% 22% 2%
24 SAH Steven 1% 10% 30% 36% 19% 3%
25 FUKUDA Diego - - 1% 7% 28% 43% 22%
26 LU Kevin - - 5% 23% 39% 27% 6%
27 ZHANG Aaron - - 5% 22% 39% 27% 6%
28 PINCHENG Yao - 1% 9% 30% 37% 19% 3%
29 CHOI Ethan - - 5% 24% 45% 25%
30 PARK Steve (Sangmin) - 2% 14% 35% 35% 13% 1%
31 BORG Matthew 2% 16% 34% 31% 14% 3% -
32 SISINNI Leonardo 7% 28% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
33 KIM Aiden - - 3% 19% 40% 30% 7%
34 XIE Buster 1% 9% 26% 35% 22% 6% 1%
35 LING Carson Jr 1% 10% 32% 38% 17% 3% -
36 CHEN Matthew - 2% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4%
37 PARK Sky - - 2% 12% 30% 38% 18%
38 KIM Daniel Y. - - 3% 18% 40% 33% 5%
39 OROPEZA David - 2% 10% 28% 37% 19% 3%
40 FOY Grant 26% 41% 25% 7% 1% - -
41 SMITH Grant D. - 1% 9% 29% 39% 20% 2%
41 TOYOFUKU Ethan 15% 40% 33% 10% 1% - -
43 RAUTUREAU Arthur 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 1%
44 GREENEBAUM Oliver 10% 38% 37% 13% 2% -
45 PARK Rion - - 4% 18% 37% 32% 9%
46 WU Lucas - 2% 12% 29% 34% 18% 3%
47 CHONG Tristan - 3% 16% 39% 31% 10% 1%
48 GOBBO Alexander - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
49 WONG Evan - 6% 21% 35% 27% 9% 1%
50 TSOI Spencer 7% 31% 39% 19% 4% - -
51 NEICE William 3% 20% 41% 28% 7% 1%
52 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
53 AGRAWAL Niki 4% 19% 35% 29% 10% 2% -
54 CHANG Nathan 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% - -
55 FINNEY Lorenz - - 4% 16% 35% 34% 11%
56 CHUN Dashel 3% 22% 43% 25% 6% 1% -
57 YUE Jackson 6% 30% 40% 20% 4% - -
58 LIU Zixian (Aaron) - 1% 7% 25% 42% 23% 3%
59 PETERSON Matthew 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
60 BAE Eugene - 3% 15% 35% 33% 12% 2%
61 BAKER Ethan 12% 37% 36% 13% 2% - -
62 ZHONG Maxwell 1% 10% 32% 39% 17% 2%
63 CHOI Ethan 3% 19% 36% 30% 11% 1%
64 ZHAN Kevin 10% 42% 35% 11% 2% - -
65 ANWEILER Nathan 7% 33% 39% 17% 3% - -
66 MANIKTALA Suvir 20% 43% 29% 8% 1% - -
66 KIM Jonah 1% 16% 40% 31% 10% 2% -
68 WONG Braxton 9% 35% 39% 14% 2% - -
69 YU ZiRun (Kinton) 4% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
70 ROSE Jacob W. 47% 40% 11% 1% - -
71 TSAY Jordan R. 4% 22% 39% 27% 8% 1% -
72 ZHANG Raphael 6% 26% 40% 22% 5% - -
73 HE Bourne 31% 44% 21% 4% - - -
74 GRINER Kevin 8% 30% 38% 19% 4% - -
75 CAJERO Luis O. 1% 7% 27% 40% 21% 4% -
76 ZHANG Andrew 42% 44% 13% 1% - - -
77 CHEN Brian 14% 35% 33% 14% 3% - -
78 KUO Jayden 45% 41% 12% 1% - - -
79 CHENG Mason 62% 33% 5% - - - -
80 CHARETTE Matthew 13% 39% 36% 11% 1% - -
81 FLANAGAN Miles 39% 41% 16% 3% - -
82 BECKER Ethan 26% 44% 25% 6% 1% - -
83 MONTGOMERY Georgie 20% 47% 27% 6% 1% - -
84 BLAM Matthew 7% 30% 40% 19% 4% - -
84 SMITH Jeremiah 47% 39% 12% 2% - - -
86 LEE Christopher 37% 44% 17% 2% - - -
87 MCCARVILL Cooper 32% 44% 20% 4% - - -
88 ROMAGOSA Leon 48% 39% 11% 1% - - -
89 POUND Michael 5% 22% 36% 27% 10% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.