Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 2 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
| 3 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 3 | DONG Haiyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 5 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 6 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 7 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 8 | MIAO Quentin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 9 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 10 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 11 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 12 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 14 | NEICE William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% | |
| 15 | CLAES Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | KIM Teddy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
| 17 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 18 | DENISON Declan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 19 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 20 | LEE Inwoo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 21 | TAI Edison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 22 | SIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | MILEY Walker | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 24 | WONG Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 25 | WANG Devin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 26 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 28 | CHENG Trevor | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 30 | LEE Damien | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 31 | FEI Victor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 32 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 33 | THOMAS Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 34 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | SHEN Jiayi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | SHIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
| 37 | WONG Baron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 37 | LIN Andrew | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 40 | SATISHKUMAR Pranav | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | AVETISIAN Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | LIN Jason | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | CHEW Aedan | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | WANG Jiacheng | 100% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | GUO Woody | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 46 | LI zerong | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 47 | LIANG Donny | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | WU Steven | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | LEE Royce | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 50 | KIM Remington | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | FU Adrian | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 53 | TANG Zheng | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 54 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 55 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 56 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 57 | AVETISIAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 58 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 98% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | CHARETTE Alex | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 61 | DACHELET Sawyer | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 62 | DILEEP Roshan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 63 | LIU Zicheng | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 64 | PROCTER Griffin | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 65 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 95% | 63% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 66 | NAEMI Barsam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 67 | DENG haoyu | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 68 | WOO Lucas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 69 | DILLON Anik | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | MA Ciel | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | LI Sean | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 72 | PORIKLI Sedat | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 73 | WOOLCOCK Cash | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 74 | LI Gen | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 75 | LIFE Tobe | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 76 | LUNDE drew | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 77 | YOUNG Quentin | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 78 | CHEONG Cameron | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 79 | RODOCANACHI Hector | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 80 | WANG aaron | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 81 | FAN Jordan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | COLLINS Kaden | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | BERTEL Florian | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 86 | LI Terrance | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 87 | YU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 88 | WANG Dylan | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 89 | QIU William | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 90 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | 87% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.