Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PARK Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% |
2 | SIYANKO Joshua | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
3 | WANG justin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
3 | KARIMOV Amir | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
5 | LAI Boden | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 43% |
6 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | 1% | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
7 | TSE Maxwell | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
8 | AHMED Mohsen | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
9 | XIE Brandon | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 15% |
10 | BRODSKY Julian | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
11 | HU Anton | - | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 15% |
12 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
13 | PAN Anthony | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
14 | LI Ray | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
15 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
16 | RVACHEV Michael | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
17 | DOUBOV Andrew | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
18 | PAN Tristan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% | |
19 | WU Chi Kuan | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
20 | ZHAO Zidong | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
21 | DUKO Phillip | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
22 | TRAN Spencer | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
23 | RIM Eugene | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
24 | LI Jade | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
25 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
26 | MEN Junda | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
27 | SONG Troy | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 28% | |
28 | BRADSHAW Carter | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
29 | LIN Nathan | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
30 | CAO Ray | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
31 | KIM Henry | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% | |
32 | BAJAJ Nakul | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
33 | LEE Aiden | - | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 5% |
34 | KAPLAN Maddox | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
35 | LY Samuel | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
36 | SONG Ryan | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
37 | CHEN Luowen | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
38 | TU Jinqi | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
39 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
40 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
41 | LIU Jeremiah W. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
42 | ZENG Andrew | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
43 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | YANG Alex | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
45 | CHANG Ian | 31% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | LEE Henry | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
47 | LIU Ethan | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
48 | GAO Victor | 2% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
49 | ALAM Rajan | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
49 | KRUPENKO Gael | 2% | 12% | 26% | 31% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
51 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
52 | NILSEN Mark | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
53 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
54 | HELMY Richard | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
55 | ZHANG Jonathan | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
56 | WANG Xiangdong | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
57 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
58 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
59 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
60 | CAO Gavin | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
61 | OCONNOR Paul | 5% | 30% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
62 | CHEN Edward | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
63 | WANG-SONG Evan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
64 | HANNA Alexander | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
65 | KIM Samuel | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
66 | TSANG Aiden | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
67 | SODANI Luke | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
68 | ZHANG Ethan | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.