Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GOFMAN Anastasia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 2 | YARBILOVA Fasikhat | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 3 | MOKRETSOV Leah | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% | < 1% |
| 3 | RAJPUT Mahek | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 5 | HAN Emma | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 6 | LEE Iona | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% | |
| 7 | ZHANG Audrey | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 8 | MAO Faith | < 1% | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 9 | CHEN Madeline | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 10 | ST-LAURENT Zoé | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 11 | CHEN Laila | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 12 | WANG Katherine | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | KIM Charlotte | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 14 | YOUNG Penelope | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 15 | LEE Zoe | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | KANDHI Aryaa | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 17 | SUN Alisha | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 18 | REDWINE Louise | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 19 | ZHAO Rachel | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | VILLER Alice | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | YOON Michelle | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | CHEN Reina | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SHEN Zoey | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 52% | 9% |
| 24 | STEWART Emily | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | OZALP Tara | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
| 26 | SIU Mila | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | LI Kayla | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | ABDALLAH Lily | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | MCNAMARA Mia | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | ERATA Selena | - | 1% | 16% | 41% | 34% | 8% | |
| 31 | CARACCIOLO Emma | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | YU sage | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 33 | SHAVERS Jasmine | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | LOUGH Abigail | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 35 | WANG Michelle | 1% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | QIN Olivia | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 37 | SHI Emma | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | YOUN Caila | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LEE Zerah | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.