Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% | |
| 2 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 3 | MILLER Jeffrey E. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 3 | STRAUSS Luke | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 34% |
| 5 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 6 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 60% | 28% | |
| 7 | WESTPHAL David R. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 52% | |
| 8 | GROSS Brian | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 1% |
| 9 | PETERSON Matthew | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
| 10 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 11 | DANIS Blake M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 39% | 5% |
| 12 | MACMILLAN Collin | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 13 | DAO Alexander | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
| 14 | WU Johnny y. | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 15 | STENCEL Andrew E. | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% | |
| 16 | KENT V David | 2% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
| 18 | HARR Carver | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 4% | |
| 19 | BUERGISSER Kai | 3% | 33% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | AGGELER Donovan | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 21 | MUENKE Magnus | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | - | |
| 22 | KRAMER Mark | - | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 23 | MCADOO Declan | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
| 24 | ELLISOR Drayten | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 25 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% | |
| 26 | PRAKASH Hari | 1% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 27 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 2% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 28 | MALLON Jaxson | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 28 | JOHNSON Jay | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 2% | |
| 30 | DANIELS Jonah | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 17% | 2% |
| 31 | PAULE Luke | - | < 1% | 2% | 12% | 41% | 45% | |
| 32 | KNUDSEN Travis | 3% | 24% | 44% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | ZHOU Austin | 10% | 44% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | EMERSON Zachary | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 35 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 36 | CHAO Warren | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | MARQUEZ Jeremy | 7% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | STAFURIK John (Jack) W. | 1% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 39 | HOLLOWAY IMRIE Colin | 73% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | OWENS Charles | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | MALLON Jeremy | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | ABEL Garrett | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | ANDERSON Donald | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | WESTON Michael | 3% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.