Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | |
2 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
3 | MILLER Jeffrey E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
3 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 34% |
5 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
6 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 28% | |
7 | WESTPHAL David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | |
8 | GROSS Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 1% |
9 | PETERSON Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% | |
10 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | |
11 | DANIS Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 5% |
12 | MACMILLAN Collin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
13 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | |
14 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
15 | STENCEL Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% | |
16 | KENT V David | 100% | 98% | 76% | 32% | 4% | - | |
17 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
18 | HARR Carver | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 4% | |
19 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 97% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
20 | AGGELER Donovan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | - | |
21 | MUENKE Magnus | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - | |
22 | KRAMER Mark | 100% | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
23 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% | |
24 | ELLISOR Drayten | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
25 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% | |
26 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
27 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
28 | MALLON Jaxson | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
28 | JOHNSON Jay | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 2% | |
30 | DANIELS Jonah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | 2% |
31 | PAULE Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
32 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 97% | 73% | 29% | 3% | - | |
33 | ZHOU Austin | 100% | 90% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
34 | EMERSON Zachary | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
35 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
36 | CHAO Warren | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
37 | MARQUEZ Jeremy | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
38 | STAFURIK John (Jack) W. | 100% | 99% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | |
39 | HOLLOWAY IMRIE Colin | 100% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
40 | OWENS Charles | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
40 | MALLON Jeremy | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | ABEL Garrett | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
43 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
44 | WESTON Michael | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.