Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 2 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 3 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 3 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 17% |
| 6 | AROUH Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% |
| 7 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% | |
| 8 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 6% |
| 9 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 10 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 11 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | |
| 12 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 8% | |
| 13 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 14 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 15 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 16 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 17 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 18 | CAO Ray | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 19 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 20 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 98% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 21 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 97% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | KOKES William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% |
| 22 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 24 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 99% | 82% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 27 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 28 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 5% |
| 29 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | ZHENG LEON | 100% | 82% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 32 | KILROY Clinton | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TANG Terry | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 34 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 99% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 81% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 37 | CHUNG Ian | 100% | 51% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 41% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.