Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 2 | HONDOR Robert D. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 53% |
| 3 | JIN Owen | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% | |
| 3 | SUN Jason | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | |
| 5 | GAO Daniel | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 6 | BEDOR William J. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 67% |
| 7 | MANN JAKEROD | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% |
| 8 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 9 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 10 | BRODSKY Julian | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
| 11 | WU Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 38% | |
| 12 | LAI Aedin | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 13 | KUGLER Luke | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | - |
| 14 | DANIEL Camron | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 15 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 16 | REDDY Arya | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 18 | SUN Jeffrey | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 19 | CAUCHY Eliot | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 5% |
| 20 | LEHR William D. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 12% |
| 21 | KARIMOV Amir | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 22 | ROUBAILO Niels | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 55% | 22% |
| 23 | PALLADINO Ben T. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 25 | PAYNE Massimo | 2% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | BAILEY David | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | |
| 27 | CHOI Joong Kyung | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | |
| 28 | CAI Brian | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 19% |
| 29 | SONG Troy | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | COHEN Jared E. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% | |
| 31 | NABAVI Matthew R. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | |
| 32 | ROBINS Brennan | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 33 | OH Kevin Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 34 | PACYNA ATILLA | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 35 | LIU Adam | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 36 | SHA Michael | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 37 | WU Colin | 14% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | REPIC Oliver | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHANG Roland | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | MEN Junda | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 41 | SCAPICCHIO Stephen | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 42 | MORTON William | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | |
| 43 | KOEPPEL Levi E. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
| 44 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 6% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | GOON Tristan Yang | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | WU Jerry | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | ZHAO Pierce | 14% | 45% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | JONELEIT Aidan | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | RIM Eugene | 14% | 45% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | YIN Chujun | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | DOUBOV Andrew | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 52 | BUSH Thomas | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% | |
| 53 | HU Robert J. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WONG Maximus | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | DEPOMMIER Remi | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 56 | ZHAO Jonathan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | ZUKOFSKY Zachary | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% | |
| 58 | CHU Brandon A. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 59 | CYR Mathieu | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 60 | STELTENKAMP Neal | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | - |
| 61 | GOON Sin Tong | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 62 | KLINKENBERG Patrick | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | NILSEN Mark | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | FENG Shang | 6% | 31% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | WELIWATTA kenula | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 66 | LI Ray | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | DAVAN Connor | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | ZEBUTH Christopher E. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 69 | YU Samuel | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 70 | FAICCO Joseph | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 71 | LI Jade | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 72 | SPITLER Ansel | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 73 | LEONE Gabe | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 74 | ZHANG Dinghao | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | FENG Du | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | MANITT Philip | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | LEVCHOOK Thomas | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 78 | WASSERMAN Jacob | 52% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 79 | DOWD Peter L. | 31% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.