Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GAO Daniel | D V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
2 | WU Jonathan | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
3 | PRIHODKO Max | V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
3 | JIN Owen | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
5 | MELCHER Jack H. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
6 | SVERDLOV Seth | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
7 | GOHEL Dayus T. | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
8 | LAI Boden | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
9 | LONCAR Luka E. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
10 | HE Xiangrui | V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
11 | ZEBROSE Cordell B. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
12 | KOGAN Aaron | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
13 | DOYON - VERDON Gabriel | D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
14 | DOYON - VERDON William | V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
15 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
16 | PACYNA ATILLA | D D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
17 | SAVORETTI Francesco | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
18 | JIANG Ryan | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
19 | GALLANT Antoine | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
20 | TRULL A.J. | V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
21 | OSTIGUY Cameron | V D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
22 | GANESAN Mathavan | V V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
23 | ZHANG Roland | V V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
24 | STELTENKAMP Neal | V V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
25 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
26 | HOLTZ Donovan K. | D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
27 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | V D V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
28 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | V V V D D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
29 | REDDY Arya | V D D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
30 | PRIHODKO Andrew | D D V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
31 | SHA Michael | D D V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
32 | SMITH Troy H. | D V D D D | V V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
33 | HONDOR Robert D. | V V V V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
34 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano | V V V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
35 | BEALS Alden | V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
36 | GOON Tristan Yang | V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
37 | PAYNE Massimo | V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
38 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | V D V V V | D | 0.9 | 4 | +3.1 |
39 | WANG Justin | V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
40 | DELAND Stuart R. | D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
41 | CHU Brandon A. | V V D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
42 | TIRRELL Justin J. | D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
43 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | D V V V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
43 | FAICCO Joseph | V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
45 | BRADSHAW Carter | V D V D V | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
46 | SONG Troy | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
47 | STEVENSON Ryan | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
48 | WANG Xiangdong | V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
49 | TORRES Gianni | D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
50 | XIE Brandon | V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
51 | RITTERSHAUS Bryce | D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
51 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
53 | CHEN Allen | D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
54 | ZHANG William | D D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
55 | PAN Anthony | D V D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
56 | CHUNG Andrew | D V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
57 | ECKERT Kevin M. | D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
58 | JIANG Matthew | D D D V V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
59 | YIN Chujun | V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
60 | FENG Du | V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
61 | YAO Jack | D D D V D | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
62 | SPRINGER Michael | D V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
63 | GOON Sin Tong | D D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
64 | ZELIN Sam J. | D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
65 | SCAPICCHIO Stephen | D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
66 | SAVORETTI Pietro | D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
67 | BAJAJ Nakul | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
68 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
69 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
70 | PETERSEN Zachary | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
70 | MEN Junda | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
72 | DOWD Peter L. | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
73 | SEILS Aether | D D D V D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
74 | BELLIVEAU Shane | V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
75 | GERSEN Jacob | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
76 | KUBATIN Anton V. | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
77 | MORI Seneca | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
78 | LIU Jeremiah W. | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
79 | SANTOS Felipe | V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
80 | WU Chi Kuan | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
81 | FENG Shang | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
82 | FEINBERG James Y. | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
83 | SONG Changze | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
84 | REELS Eric J. | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
85 | HOWELL Liam | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
86 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
87 | MURRAY John P. | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
88 | SONG Ryan | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
88 | MASSE Jack | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
90 | GU Eric | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.