Midwest ROC (DV1A, DV2, VET) & RJCC

Div I-A Men's Épée

Saturday, May 18, 2024 at 11:30 AM

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 IVAKIMOV Vasil 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 17%
2 ZHENG Andy 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 56% 12%
3 WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
3 BROOKS Zachary B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
5 TOLLEFSON Zachary 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 24% 3%
6 KARNAS Karol 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 14%
7 AGARWAL Adheesh 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 11% 1%
8 MITEV Alexander 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 25% 3%
9 JOVANOVIC Jovan 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 53%
10 CHAN Matthew 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 36% 8%
11 MCDOWELL Will 100% 99% 90% 62% 27% 6% -
12 ASGARALLY Anthony 100% 100% 98% 84% 51% 16% 1%
13 BORISENKO Samuel 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 13% 2%
14 DHAL Leon 100% 99% 88% 56% 20% 3% -
15 ZHENG Jerry 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 14% 2%
16 ZIEGLER John 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 8% 1%
17 XIE Brandon 100% 98% 83% 51% 18% 3%
18 TIKHOMIROV Theodore 100% 100% 94% 73% 35% 8% 1%
19 SNIDER Jeffrey H. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 17%
20 SUVOROV Yuly 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 27%
21 GRAVES Lawson 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 11% 1%
22 LUEDECKE Myles A. 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 10%
23 NOWAK Jakub P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 76%
24 GINZBURG Adam 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 4%
25 CURTY Jack 100% 97% 74% 30% 6% 1% -
26 WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. 100% 98% 87% 60% 27% 6% 1%
27 SHOUSHA Yassin 100% 93% 69% 33% 9% 1% -
28 FU Jason 100% 100% 98% 86% 48% 6%
29 STONE Brian M. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 21%
30 DOWD Peter L. 100% 66% 21% 3% - - -
31 CHEN Bowen 100% 74% 33% 8% 1% -
32 SHOUSHA Hamza 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
33 BRANNON Nathan 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 39%
34 THOMAS Samuel 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 39% 8%
35 BARFORD Giovanni 100% 94% 62% 25% 5% 1% -
36 VEZMAR Evan H. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 15%
37 MASON Alexander T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 54%
38 SERAFYM Damian 100% 98% 83% 52% 20% 4% -
39 BEACH John 100% 100% 99% 95% 78% 44% 11%
40 DOUBOV Andrew 100% 97% 76% 39% 10% 1% -
41 XIAO Yichen 100% 98% 79% 43% 13% 2% -
42 MILLER Lance W. 100% 98% 84% 48% 12% -
43 DEPAUW Devan 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 15%
44 WILKINSON Derek H. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 26%
44 CHUTKAY Sai Pratham 100% 94% 66% 28% 6% 1% -
46 HU Robert J. 100% 100% 93% 67% 29% 6% -
47 KENT Dwain 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 8%
48 SAMUEL Nirmel 100% 99% 83% 47% 15% 2% -
49 YANAMANDRA Sidhansh 100% 100% 97% 81% 48% 15% 2%
50 HE Lingyun Matthew 100% 92% 60% 21% 3% -
51 DALTON Matthew 100% 99% 91% 67% 34% 10% 1%
52 STENCEL Andrew E. 100% 99% 93% 70% 33% 7% -
53 ZHANG James 100% 70% 29% 7% 1% - -
54 PETROVICH Alexandar 100% 95% 69% 31% 8% 1% -
55 CONKLIN Jim 100% 100% 98% 82% 44% 12% 1%
56 SWANSON Dave 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 23% 3%
57 MCNALLY Thomas J. 100% 93% 69% 34% 10% 2% -
58 ELTERMAN Lev 100% 95% 72% 36% 11% 2% -
59 COHEN Henry 100% 77% 35% 7% 1% -
60 VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 10% 1%
61 ZHANG Lucas 100% 89% 45% 10% 1% - -
62 VUILLEMIN Gregoire 100% 99% 85% 52% 18% 3% -
63 ZHANG Michael 100% 79% 35% 8% 1% - -
64 RIECK Brennan 100% 68% 25% 5% - - -
65 TAHA Raymond 100% 86% 48% 13% 1% -
66 WILLIAMS Logan 100% 98% 78% 40% 11% 1% -
67 BISSEN Quinn 100% 100% 93% 68% 32% 8% 1%
68 EVERT Todd 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 18% 2%
69 KRAVETZ Benjamin (Ben) D. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 31% 4%
70 ALI Adam 100% 92% 64% 27% 6% 1%
71 JANYSKA Allen 100% 89% 58% 24% 5% 1% -
72 VENTURELLA George 100% 47% 10% 1% - - -
73 SCHROEDER Karl A. 100% 99% 90% 66% 32% 8% 1%
74 CASTELLANOS Rene E. 100% 87% 54% 21% 5% - -
75 AGROMAYOR Benjamin 100% 89% 55% 19% 3% - -
76 PATEL Aayan 100% 59% 18% 3% - - -
77 RITTERBUSCH Timothy 100% 91% 64% 29% 7% 1% -
78 TAKATA Benjamin 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 10%
79 GERACI Paul A. 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 25% 5%
80 BARNEY JR. Terry 100% 39% 7% 1% - - -
81 SHOEMAKER Oliver 100% 44% 8% 1% - - -
82 STONE Ken 100% 31% 4% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.