National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Y-10 Men's Saber

Sunday, July 7, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GU Andrew 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 36%
2 ISAYENKO Daniel 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 36%
3 YU Ian 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 37%
3 YUEN Caleb 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 48%
5 KAUL Ishaan 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 27%
6 DEGUZMAN Miguel Javier 100% 86% 50% 16% 3% -
7 PARK Sean 100% 100% 96% 80% 49% 18% 3%
8 FU BRANDEN 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 17%
9 ARTETA-CHEVALIER Ulysse 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 19% 3%
10 MOELLER Felix 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 23% 3%
10 SU Eric 100% 100% 95% 75% 40% 11% 1%
12 ZALETAEV Jacob 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 37% 7%
13 SALMAN Ibrahim 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
14 LEVY Daniel 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 22% 1%
15 CHUNG Evan 100% 96% 78% 45% 16% 3% -
16 CHOI LIAM 100% 100% 98% 84% 48% 13% 1%
17 NARAYAN Rishi 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 40% 7%
18 MOGUNOV Alan 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 39% 8%
19 LIM JUWANA Maximilian 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 32%
20 TAN Daniel 100% 92% 61% 22% 4% < 1% -
21 SUH Jordan 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 8% 1%
22 LVOVSKIY Roman 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 12% 1%
23 CHEN Leo 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 15%
24 CAO HAOTIAN 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
25 ZHANG Caleb 100% 100% 95% 75% 41% 13% 2%
26 O'KEEFE Brody 100% 98% 85% 55% 23% 5% -
27 LI Jayden 100% 98% 79% 41% 11% 1% -
28 LUO Gavin 100% 92% 65% 29% 7% 1% -
29 DENG Richard 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 23% 4%
30 LU Simon 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 22% 4%
31 WANG Harrison 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 6% -
32 SUN Leonard 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 14% 2%
33 KOREN George 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 19%
34 KIM Junseong 100% 100% 99% 95% 79% 46% 13%
35 THOMAS Tre 100% 96% 69% 29% 6% 1%
36 WANG James 100% 99% 92% 68% 34% 9% 1%
37 DESAI Arthav 100% 100% 96% 76% 38% 9% 1%
38 IP Hunter 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 16%
39 ALUF William 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 39%
40 QI Zach 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
41 CHEN Aaron 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 32% 6%
41 CHEN Brian 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 4%
43 ZHOU Ryan 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 71%
44 TABANCAY Cole 100% 100% 99% 87% 54% 18% 2%
45 LEI Isaac 100% 78% 39% 12% 2% < 1% -
46 RISMAN Edward 100% 99% 87% 56% 23% 5% -
47 FAVO Christopher 100% 99% 91% 65% 31% 8% 1%
48 MAKLIN David 100% 100% 94% 74% 40% 12% 1%
49 GILBERT Ari 100% 97% 80% 46% 16% 3% -
50 LI Jason 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 19% 2%
51 EKAMBARAM Rithik 100% 100% 95% 77% 45% 15% 2%
52 HU Simon 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
53 HAHN EVER 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 56% 15%
54 FAN Yuchen 100% 98% 87% 56% 21% 4% -
55 HSIEH Maxwell 100% 96% 73% 36% 10% 2% -
56 WANG Henrik 100% 97% 81% 49% 18% 3% -
57 TERENTIEV Michael 100% 100% 95% 74% 37% 8%
58 ZHANG Howard 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
59 WANG David 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 16%
60 ZHANG Mark 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 5% -
61 BADMUS David 100% 100% 94% 73% 38% 11% 1%
62 BURCH III Andrew J. 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 26% 3%
63 CANNON Rowen 100% 96% 71% 30% 6% 1% -
64 OH Caleb 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 9%
65 SHAPIRO Leo 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 18%
66 HEILMANN Christian 100% 100% 100% 95% 79% 44% 11%
67 KELLY Collin 100% 99% 90% 66% 32% 8% 1%
68 LIU Qunyi 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
69 LEE Shane Gunn 100% 100% 99% 94% 77% 43% 11%
70 PARK Layne 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
71 SHARMA Ayaan 100% 99% 92% 68% 34% 10% 1%
72 DING Orlando 100% 94% 69% 33% 8% 1% -
73 KIM Eric 100% 100% 100% 96% 82% 49% 14%
74 CIECIEREGA MATTHEW 100% 100% 96% 81% 51% 19% 3%
74 CHEN Harrison 100% 93% 64% 23% 4% - -
76 ROSE Parker 100% 100% 99% 95% 80% 46% 12%
77 WONG Alexander 100% 100% 96% 75% 38% 11% 1%
77 MOODY-FUENTES Nelson 100% 99% 89% 62% 28% 6% -
79 ZHANG Hanzhi 100% 72% 28% 5% - - -
80 HEILMANN Caleb 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 41% 9%
81 LAN Jasper 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 6% -
82 MISHRA Ayan 100% 92% 58% 20% 3% - -
83 BROOKS Grant 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
84 STOKELY Samuel 100% 98% 82% 47% 15% 2%
85 GONG Johnny 100% 69% 26% 5% - - -
86 FAN Yuen 100% 98% 84% 53% 21% 4% -
87 STYS Owen 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 24% 3%
88 SHEK-WEI Wesley 100% 93% 64% 24% 4% - -
88 CHIDAMBARAM Nivedh 100% 75% 34% 8% 1% - -
90 SABINO Bennett 100% 100% 96% 82% 50% 17% 2%
91 TIAGI Ronald 100% 97% 80% 45% 14% 2% -
92 LEE Caleb 100% 49% 12% 2% - - -
92 ROSENBLATT Ezra 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 17%
94 NORTON Hudson 100% 92% 63% 27% 7% 1% -
94 LI Nathan 100% 87% 48% 13% 1% - -
96 LI Derek 100% 96% 76% 41% 13% 2% -
97 BECKER Grayson 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% 1% -
98 ZHEN Felix 100% 98% 80% 41% 8% 1% -
99 JACOBS Eitan 100% 83% 43% 12% 2% -
100 HAGN Maximilian 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 16%
101 WOLLOW Bennett 100% 80% 36% 8% 1% - -
102 HENDERSHOT Henry 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 44% 12%
103 FAZELINIA Erfaan 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 61% 14%
104 RAJMOHAN Syon 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
104 GUO Aiden 100% 93% 67% 29% 6% 1% -
106 KATZ Isaac 100% 87% 52% 19% 4% - -
106 CHEN Tyler 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 16%
108 CHEN Tyler 100% 67% 23% 4% - - -
109 LI Lucas 100% 87% 54% 21% 5% - -
110 HWANG Jacob 100% 96% 77% 44% 16% 3% -
111 NABOKA Ruslan 100% 97% 75% 37% 10% 1% -
112 LEE Weston 100% 83% 47% 17% 3% - -
113 FENG Kevin 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 10% 1%
114 WHITE Benjamin 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
115 SOSA Theodore 100% 81% 43% 13% 2% - -
116 SHARMA KRISH 100% 97% 82% 52% 21% 5% -
117 GHATTAS August 100% 99% 92% 71% 38% 12% 2%
118 CORD Ryan-Cody 100% 45% 10% 1% - - -
119 ABADA anders 100% 96% 73% 37% 11% 2% -
120 SHELTON Dax 100% 91% 60% 24% 5% 1% -
120 DUBIN Jake 100% 76% 29% 5% 1% - -
122 WONG Jacob 100% 89% 56% 19% 3% -
123 KAAKEH Taim 100% 69% 23% 3% - - -
124 KAAKEH Kareem 100% 54% 15% 2% - - -
125 LEVY Rafa 100% 100% 98% 89% 64% 29% 6%
126 STANFORD Aiden 100% 50% 11% 1% - - -
127 SOBOLEWSKI Isaac 100% 87% 46% 11% 1% - -
128 SAFAI Bardia 100% 47% 11% 1% - -
129 TOTH Oliver 100% 93% 63% 25% 5% 1% -
130 MACKENZIE Mark 100% 85% 50% 17% 3% - -
131 WU Vincent 100% 58% 18% 3% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.