Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHENG Thomas C. | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% | ||
| 2 | LIU Justin | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 3 | PRILUTSKY David B. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 3 | CHEN Ziyuan | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 5 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 16% |
| 6 | KIM Brandon J. | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 7 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 8 | ARIZA Isaac A. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | HO Ryan J. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 10 | VOGLER Justin K. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 11 | BESSIRE Nolan S. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 12 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 13 | IRVINE Jonathan J. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 14 | KO Brian J. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | ||
| 15 | OH Samuel H. | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% | |
| 16 | LIN Richard W. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 17 | LEVY Jacob M. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 18 | LAO Scott E. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 20 | NAGIMOV Marsel | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 21 | YU Vinni | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 22 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 23 | SHIH William | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 24 | DAVIS Christopher M. | - | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 37% | 11% |
| 26 | LI Raphael C. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | UPTON Michael | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 28 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 29 | OURSLER Jack | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 18% | |
| 30 | HAN Andersen Y. | 1% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | OH Jonathan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 33 | ZUSIN Zachary W. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 12% |
| 34 | CHIN Julian S. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 35 | PAEK Alex J. | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 36 | CHOI Ethan L. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 37 | KELLY William J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 38 | CHOI Samuel | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 39 | JEON Caleb A. | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | ||
| 40 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 43% | 25% |
| 41 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 42 | UM Ethan A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 43 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 44 | BAE Junnie | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 3% |
| 45 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 46 | LIN Dashiell | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 47 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
| 48 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 49 | DICKSON Farr R. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 50 | PICKERING Owen D. | - | 6% | 28% | 46% | 21% | ||
| 51 | KUMBLA Samarth | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 52 | BANERJEE ANUP | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 53 | NGUYEN Nish | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 54 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 56 | LI Nicholas X | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 57 | DESHMUKH Ayush | 4% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 58 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 5% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 2% | ||
| 59 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 60 | KIM Isaiah G. | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 62 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | 3% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 63 | WU Conrad J. | 3% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 64 | KO Tyler B. | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | ||
| 65 | HONG Daniel | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | ||
| 66 | WANG Andrew | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 67 | MURRAY Maximo | 3% | 27% | 44% | 22% | 3% | ||
| 68 | ZHANG Luke T. | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 69 | LA ROSA Federico | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 69 | KIM Aaron J. | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | DARIANO Noah G. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 72 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 73 | MAO Connor | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LEE David Y. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 76 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 79 | AVRON Case B. | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | NEWHARD Noah A. | - | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 81 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 82 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 83 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 43% | 12% |
| 84 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 85 | CHENG Matthew S. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 86 | FU Samuel Y. | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | ||
| 87 | YU Anders | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 88 | TSANG Matthew K. | 7% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 89 | SOMERS Sean | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 90 | HUANG Kevin D. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | MORALES Ian N. | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 92 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 93 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | SONG Dylan S. | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 95 | KIM Jackson | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 96 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 19% | 46% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | XIAO Anthony | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 99 | FINLEY Dylan | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 100 | KIM BANSEOK | 49% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 101 | NAM Michael | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 102 | SWEENEY Quinn | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | ||
| 102 | MILLER Duncan R. | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | CHEN Wilson | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 105 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 106 | LI Ryan Z. | 49% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 107 | SEAL Maximus R. | 31% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 108 | KIM Derek A. | 30% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 108 | HSIUNG Richie | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 110 | SANTOS FINK Sage A. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 111 | LUH Ethan K. | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 112 | LAHAUG Ethan R. | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.