2019 USA Fencing Anaheim SJCC Tournament

Cadet Men's Foil

Saturday, March 16, 2019 at 8:30 AM

Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHENG Thomas C. 100% 100% 97% 77% 32%
2 LIU Justin 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
3 PRILUTSKY David B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 54%
3 CHEN Ziyuan 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 35%
5 MARTINEZ Donavyn E. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 16%
6 KIM Brandon J. 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 13% 2%
7 GRIFFIN John O. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 72%
8 ARIZA Isaac A. 100% 100% 97% 80% 43% 11% 1%
9 HO Ryan J. 100% 100% 98% 85% 56% 21% 3%
10 VOGLER Justin K. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 39%
11 BESSIRE Nolan S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 36%
12 ZENG Lucas H. 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 35% 7%
13 IRVINE Jonathan J. 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19%
14 KO Brian J. 100% 99% 91% 63% 21%
15 OH Samuel H. 100% 100% 97% 81% 43% 8%
16 LIN Richard W. 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 18% 3%
17 LEVY Jacob M. 100% 100% 99% 88% 58% 18%
18 LAO Scott E. 100% 99% 94% 72% 37% 10% 1%
19 CHIN Jason Y. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 14%
20 NAGIMOV Marsel 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
21 YU Vinni 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
22 KIM Nicholas W. 100% 100% 98% 84% 51% 14%
23 SHIH William 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 33% 6%
24 DAVIS Christopher M. 100% 100% 88% 55% 19% 3% -
25 HAMILTON Bogdan A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 48% 11%
26 LI Raphael C. 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 10% 1%
27 UPTON Michael 100% 99% 90% 59% 23% 4% -
28 XIAO Ethan J. 100% 100% 100% 96% 82% 51% 16%
29 OURSLER Jack 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 18%
30 HAN Andersen Y. 100% 99% 79% 40% 11% 1% -
31 TSAY Jeremy M. 100% 98% 85% 57% 25% 6% 1%
32 OH Jonathan 100% 99% 91% 66% 31% 7% -
33 ZUSIN Zachary W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 53% 12%
34 CHIN Julian S. 100% 99% 90% 59% 20% 2%
35 PAEK Alex J. 100% 100% 98% 88% 63% 29% 6%
36 CHOI Ethan L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 18%
37 KELLY William J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 16%
38 CHOI Samuel 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 4% -
39 JEON Caleb A. 100% 97% 78% 39% 8%
40 SONG Aiden S. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 25%
41 VASILIEV Sacha M. 100% 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 8%
42 UM Ethan A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 32%
43 STANLEY Mason B. 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 21% 3%
44 BAE Junnie 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 30% 3%
45 GRANT Lachlan K. 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 22% 3%
46 LIN Dashiell 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
47 XIAO Enoch A. 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 34% 5%
48 GIRALDO Pablo E. 100% 99% 89% 59% 22% 3%
49 DICKSON Farr R. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 41%
50 PICKERING Owen D. 100% 100% 94% 66% 21%
51 KUMBLA Samarth 100% 98% 85% 51% 17% 2%
52 BANERJEE ANUP 100% 99% 91% 62% 25% 4%
53 NGUYEN Nish 100% 100% 98% 83% 49% 15% 2%
54 MURUHIN Yaroslav 100% 95% 72% 37% 11% 1% -
55 FUKUDA Renzo K. 100% 98% 83% 50% 18% 3% -
56 LI Nicholas X 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1% -
57 DESHMUKH Ayush 100% 96% 73% 34% 7% 1%
58 FREEDMAN Samuel E. 100% 95% 61% 19% 2%
59 ZHENG Alan H. 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
60 KIM Isaiah G. 100% 94% 69% 30% 6% 1% -
61 HOOSHI Jayden C. 100% 100% 97% 77% 40% 10% 1%
62 GODZHIK Zachary 100% 100% 96% 73% 34% 9% 1%
63 WU Conrad J. 100% 97% 67% 27% 6% 1% -
64 KO Tyler B. 100% 66% 23% 4% -
65 HONG Daniel 100% 99% 86% 52% 14%
66 WANG Andrew 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 14% 2%
67 MURRAY Maximo 100% 97% 69% 25% 3%
68 ZHANG Luke T. 100% 96% 70% 31% 7% 1%
69 LA ROSA Federico 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 20%
69 KIM Aaron J. 100% 89% 54% 17% 2% -
71 DARIANO Noah G. 100% 99% 92% 66% 26% 4%
72 FUKUDA Alessio R. 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 21% 3%
73 MAO Connor 100% 90% 61% 27% 7% 1% -
74 LEE David Y. 100% 86% 50% 18% 3% - -
75 JAYASEKARA Hiran H. 100% 100% 96% 75% 37% 9% 1%
76 SUNG Chang-Han S. 100% 82% 43% 12% 1% - -
77 VAZQUEZ Zander 100% 100% 96% 76% 39% 9% 1%
79 AVRON Case B. 100% 79% 35% 8% 1% -
80 NEWHARD Noah A. 100% 100% 92% 64% 27% 6% -
81 XIAO EDWARD 100% 100% 89% 56% 20% 3% -
82 CHIRASHNYA Adam 100% 94% 71% 37% 12% 2% -
83 HOOSHI Dylan M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 54% 12%
84 PHAM-CHANG Duke A. 100% 89% 57% 21% 4% - -
85 CHENG Matthew S. 100% 97% 78% 42% 13% 2% -
86 FU Samuel Y. 100% 89% 52% 16% 2%
87 YU Anders 100% 98% 80% 43% 12% 1%
88 TSANG Matthew K. 100% 93% 62% 24% 5% -
89 SOMERS Sean 100% 86% 48% 14% 2% -
90 HUANG Kevin D. 100% 77% 34% 8% 1% -
91 MORALES Ian N. 100% 93% 64% 26% 4% - -
92 STRUGAR Marcus A. 100% 97% 81% 48% 17% 3% -
93 MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
94 SONG Dylan S. 100% 100% 92% 66% 29% 6% -
95 KIM Jackson 100% 97% 79% 46% 15% 2% -
96 GOLDADE Luke A. 100% 75% 33% 8% 1% - -
97 UZGIRIS Kovas 100% 81% 35% 8% 1% - -
98 XIAO Anthony 100% 99% 89% 62% 28% 7% 1%
99 FINLEY Dylan 100% 63% 17% 2% - - -
100 KIM BANSEOK 100% 51% 7% - - - -
101 NAM Michael 100% 19% 2% - - - -
102 SWEENEY Quinn 100% 36% 5% - -
102 MILLER Duncan R. 100% 79% 37% 8% 1% -
104 CHEN Wilson 100% 54% 14% 2% - -
105 MCCOSH Evin M. 100% 48% 11% 1% - -
106 LI Ryan Z. 100% 51% 10% 1% - - -
107 SEAL Maximus R. 100% 69% 16% 2% - - -
108 KIM Derek A. 100% 70% 20% 3% - - -
108 HSIUNG Richie 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
110 SANTOS FINK Sage A. 100% 69% 26% 5% - - -
111 LUH Ethan K. 100% 89% 56% 19% 3% - -
112 LAHAUG Ethan R. 100% 28% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.