Air Force Cadet Field House - Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
2 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
3 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
3 | SCHIEK Harrison | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
5 | EMARA Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
6 | LONGSHORE IZEYAH T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% |
7 | WU Alistair | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
8 | TUCKER Brad W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
9 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 22% |
10 | REAGAN Dustin R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | |
11 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 5% |
12 | ELLISON Harper F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
13 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
14 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
15 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 19% | 1% | |
16 | KIM Remington | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | |
17 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
18 | PETERSON Matthew | 100% | 98% | 75% | 24% | 2% | - | |
19 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
20 | TEITENBERG John F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
20 | PADHYE Siddhant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
22 | CUMMINGS Kai | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
23 | DANIELS Jonah | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
24 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
25 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | |
26 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
27 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | |
28 | JAN Timothy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
29 | TIEMANN Landen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | - |
30 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
31 | CELECKI Barrett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 7% | |
32 | GUO Woody | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
33 | LIU Noah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | - |
34 | ROBERTS Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 5% |
35 | DANIS Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
36 | MILEY Walker | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
37 | KENT V David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
38 | AGGELER Donovan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
39 | MALLON Jaxson | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
40 | FERRELL-CARRETEY Elliot | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
41 | MARENCIK Miles | 100% | 82% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
42 | BROOKS Justin | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
43 | MUENKE Magnus | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | GRODITSKI Alexander | 100% | 86% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
45 | KENT IV David | 100% | 85% | 31% | 4% | - | - | |
46 | MALLON Jeremy | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
47 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
48 | EFE Joshua E. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
48 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
50 | STRACUZZI Hudson | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
51 | HENSLEY Roran | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
51 | MILLER Joshua | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
53 | GADBURY Logan | 100% | 73% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
54 | DANIELS Jonathan | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
55 | HEADRICK Jack | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
56 | SAMARRIPA Max | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
57 | LONADIER Robert | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
58 | STAFURIK John (Jack) W. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
59 | COSGROVE Franklin | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.