Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% | |
| 2 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
| 3 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 5 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 17% | |
| 6 | OROPEZA David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% |
| 7 | SALEH Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 8 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 28% |
| 9 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 10 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 11 | BELCHAMBER Mason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 12 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 13 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 27% | 3% |
| 14 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
| 15 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | LU Jingyi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 6% | |
| 17 | BERNARD Cohen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 18 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
| 19 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 20 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 21 | BOURGUIGNAT James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 22 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | NEWMAN Noah | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 25 | JIN Andy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | POWELL Sean | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 29 | LI Evan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | HUANG Chenghan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 34 | GAO Andrew Gao | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 35 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 36 | QU Richard | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 37 | FOGELSON Hugh | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 38 | VOLLMER Quintin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
| 39 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 40 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 41 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | CHUN Zachary | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | OH Joshua | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | SALEH Ali | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 47 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 48 | WANG Luke | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | HU Daniel | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | HU Ben | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | YOUM Tyson | 100% | 89% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 53 | SUN Henry | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 54 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 54 | NG Kai | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 56 | CHUN Alexander | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.