Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NORTH Gary S. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 2 | KENYON Jacob | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | CHEN Brian | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | WOLFE Alex | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 5 | LEE Aiden | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | TIKHONOV Daniel | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 7 | DISIMONE David Z. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 8 | RIVERA RIVERA Christian | D D V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 9 | YANG Gary | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 10 | TIKHONOV Iliya | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | BOUDREAUX James | D V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 12 | DICKENS Robert W. | V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 14 | WITTER Catherine A. | D V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 15 | SNYDER IV William B. | D D V D V V | V D | 5.4 | 3 | -2.4 |
| 16 | SWICK Kerry J. | V D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 17 | LEE Anton | V D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 18 | SEIKEL Spencer | D V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 19 | COFFEY Jacob | V V D V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | EVANS Grant | V D V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 21 | MEGGERS Samuel | D D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 22 | IHRIE Greg H. | V D V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | LEECH Braedan | V D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 24 | HELMINTOLLER Christian | V V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 25 | WU Shaochi | D V V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 26 | CHAWLA Aarav | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | D D D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 28 | WALKER Benjamin | V D V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 29 | WOOLF Fredrika | V D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | KENYON Benjamin | D V V D D D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 31 | MARSH Alex | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 32 | LIN Haley | V D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | MERIWETHER Anne | V D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 34 | HALE Bradley | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 35 | TAN Theodore | D D V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 36 | LORENZ Nathan | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 37 | SAVAGE Austin | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 38 | THIBAULT Azzy | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 39 | FONS Amandine | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 40 | ECKENROAD Hannah | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 41 | CHEN Shanshan | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.