Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NORTH Gary S. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 2 | KENYON Jacob | - | - | - | 7% | 47% | 46% | |
| 3 | CHEN Brian | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 29% | 5% |
| 3 | WOLFE Alex | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 44% | 13% |
| 5 | LEE Aiden | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
| 6 | TIKHONOV Daniel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 7 | DISIMONE David Z. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% |
| 8 | RIVERA RIVERA Christian | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 9 | YANG Gary | - | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
| 10 | TIKHONOV Iliya | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 11 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 12 | DICKENS Robert W. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 51% | 35% | |
| 13 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | - | 9% | 39% | 43% | 8% | - | |
| 14 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% |
| 15 | SNYDER IV William B. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 50% |
| 16 | SWICK Kerry J. | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 17 | LEE Anton | - | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 18 | SEIKEL Spencer | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 19 | COFFEY Jacob | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 20 | EVANS Grant | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 21 | MEGGERS Samuel | - | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 22 | IHRIE Greg H. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LEECH Braedan | 3% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 24 | HELMINTOLLER Christian | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | WU Shaochi | 1% | 25% | 49% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | CHAWLA Aarav | 2% | 18% | 46% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 1% |
| 28 | WALKER Benjamin | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 2% |
| 29 | WOOLF Fredrika | 5% | 39% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | KENYON Benjamin | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 31 | MARSH Alex | 3% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LIN Haley | 1% | 41% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | MERIWETHER Anne | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | HALE Bradley | 42% | 50% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | TAN Theodore | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | LORENZ Nathan | 36% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SAVAGE Austin | 1% | 33% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | THIBAULT Azzy | 26% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | FONS Amandine | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | ECKENROAD Hannah | 63% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | CHEN Shanshan | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.