Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 2 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 40% |
| 3 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% |
| 3 | LE Jacob W. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 5 | AIBEL Hudson J. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 6 | LI Peihong | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 24% | |
| 7 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
| 8 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 9 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 50% | 28% |
| 10 | RENTERIA Emiliano | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | WONG Antonio | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 12 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | 1% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
| 13 | CHOU Jared T. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% | |
| 14 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 48% | 38% | |
| 15 | GOBBO Alexander | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 16 | DINSAY Kristjan | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 17 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 18 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | - | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% | |
| 19 | NORIEGA Julian | - | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | PIESNER Zachary C. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 21 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 50% | 24% | 3% |
| 22 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 41% | 12% | |
| 23 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | TAN Peter | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | CHOI Ethan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 28 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 3% | |
| 29 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 30 | BAUER Roman | 7% | 39% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | LAKE Wyatt J. | - | - | 6% | 33% | 44% | 17% | |
| 34 | ZHENG Zhe | 2% | 20% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | SIU Aiden | 14% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | KIM Aiden | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
| 37 | CHEN Jaden K. | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | OH Joshua | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 39 | ASHJIAN Nicolas | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 40 | FANG Jaden | 1% | 8% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | LLIDO Soren | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 42 | ULLOA Trent J. | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | DING SHENGLANG | - | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | LLOYD henry | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 45 | KIM Luke | 38% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | HAHN Jacob | 31% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | KEITH HUDSON | 16% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | ZENG Chuyi | 20% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | QIU Tengjie | 42% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | AGEYEV Aleksey | 12% | 40% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | SIDDIQI Amman | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | WANG Rui Qin | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | KHODYAKOV Nikolai | 24% | 48% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | PARK Gabriel | 10% | 29% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SAIDINER Zachary | 6% | 31% | 45% | 17% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | WU James | 6% | 38% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | CHU Colin | 61% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.