Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 2 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% |
| 3 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 10% |
| 3 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 5 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 6 | LI Peihong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 24% | |
| 7 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
| 8 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 9 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 28% |
| 10 | RENTERIA Emiliano | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 12 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 39% | |
| 13 | CHOU Jared T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% | |
| 14 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% | |
| 15 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 16 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 17 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 18 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | |
| 19 | NORIEGA Julian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 21 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 27% | 3% |
| 22 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 12% | |
| 23 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | TAN Peter | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 28 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 3% | |
| 29 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 30 | BAUER Roman | 100% | 93% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 17% | |
| 34 | ZHENG Zhe | 100% | 98% | 78% | 33% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 86% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | |
| 37 | CHEN Jaden K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | OH Joshua | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 39 | ASHJIAN Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 40 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
| 41 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 42 | ULLOA Trent J. | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | DING SHENGLANG | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 44 | LLOYD henry | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 45 | KIM Luke | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | HAHN Jacob | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | KEITH HUDSON | 100% | 84% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | QIU Tengjie | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | AGEYEV Aleksey | 100% | 88% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | SIDDIQI Amman | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | WANG Rui Qin | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | KHODYAKOV Nikolai | 100% | 76% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 90% | 61% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SAIDINER Zachary | 100% | 94% | 63% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | WU James | 100% | 94% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | CHU Colin | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.