AFM Super Regional SYC/RJCC/ROC Div1A/Vet

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, October 27, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIN Youlong - - - - - 4% 96%
2 WU Alber Y. - - - - - 11% 88%
3 RAUTUREAU Hugo - - - - 2% 21% 76%
3 CHANG Jonathan - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
5 WANDJI Noah - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
6 GUTH Joseph - - - - 1% 18% 81%
7 CHOI Ethan - - - 1% 13% 50% 35%
8 YUE Jackson - - 2% 15% 41% 35% 7%
9 CHEN Matthew - - - - 2% 19% 80%
9 ZHONG Maxwell - - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
11 ZHOU Shawn - - 5% 26% 55% 15%
12 CHONG Tristan - 1% 8% 27% 41% 22%
13 LEE Jaden - - 1% 11% 37% 41% 9%
14 LI Edison M. - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
15 LOZANO Veyron Jericho - - - 3% 17% 41% 38%
16 TSAY Jordan R. - 2% 13% 33% 37% 14%
17 RAUTUREAU Arthur - - - 2% 14% 42% 43%
18 RODRIGUEZ Tyler - - - 1% 10% 47% 41%
19 LI Richard - - - 3% 17% 45% 35%
20 CHEN Anson - - 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
21 ELKOUSY Zain al Din - - - 5% 21% 43% 31%
22 SU Preston 1% 8% 28% 39% 21% 4% -
22 LI Lucas - - 1% 10% 30% 40% 18%
24 YOU Alan - 1% 6% 23% 40% 26% 5%
25 ZHOU Ryan - - 1% 5% 23% 46% 25%
26 SISINNI Leonardo - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
27 ZHOU Chenqiao - - - 3% 30% 67%
28 WANG Elijah (QiChen) 1% 7% 25% 38% 24% 5%
29 UYPECKCUAT Maximillian Trajan - 5% 20% 36% 29% 9% 1%
30 DOUGLASS Liam 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2% -
31 CHENG Mason 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 8% -
32 CHANG Eric Jonathan - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4%
33 LU Kevin - - - - 5% 33% 62%
33 HAYES Stewart - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 24%
35 LI Daniel - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
36 TEH Tang-Ngu - - 4% 20% 40% 30% 5%
37 ONG Nicholas - - 2% 14% 35% 36% 12%
38 FOY Grant - - 7% 31% 43% 19% 1%
39 MANIKTALA Suvir 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
40 BIELER Mason - - 4% 20% 43% 33%
41 CHANG Parker - 3% 18% 39% 32% 8%
42 GUO Joey 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2% -
43 PE Noah - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 4%
43 XIE Yimo 1% 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
45 YANG Tate - - 4% 22% 42% 28% 4%
46 HONG Edwin - 2% 12% 33% 37% 15% 1%
47 HE Ian - 5% 22% 37% 28% 7% -
48 YANG Charles - - 2% 11% 32% 40% 14%
49 FUKUDA Brando - 1% 7% 21% 34% 28% 8%
50 JIN Xuechong Daniel - 1% 8% 33% 42% 16% -
51 WANG Tiger - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
52 LEE Abin - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 1%
53 LINEBERRY CADEN 6% 26% 40% 23% 4% -
54 WANG sicheng 2% 17% 39% 31% 10% 1%
54 PARK Andrew - 3% 19% 39% 31% 8%
56 CHANG Jeremy - - 3% 16% 37% 34% 9%
57 ZHANG Raphael - - 5% 21% 41% 30% 3%
57 HO Christopher - 1% 11% 40% 36% 11% 1%
59 HUANG Nathan 1% 13% 34% 33% 15% 3% -
60 WANG Waylon 3% 16% 31% 30% 15% 4% -
61 HARRIS Hayden 4% 29% 41% 21% 5% - -
62 HE Gary 9% 32% 39% 18% 2% -
63 BACON Maxwell 18% 39% 30% 10% 2% -
64 MURDOCK Koichi - 6% 27% 41% 22% 3% -
65 NAIR Sujit - 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 1%
66 ZHANG Andrew 3% 15% 30% 31% 17% 4% -
67 CHAN Joseph - 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 3%
68 YE Jerry - 1% 6% 25% 41% 24% 3%
68 WEI Winston - 1% 9% 28% 39% 21% 2%
70 LEE Mason - 1% 12% 43% 34% 9% -
71 PARK Avan 1% 13% 32% 33% 16% 4% -
72 SU Desmond - 4% 17% 36% 32% 11% -
73 YEE Colin - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24% -
74 LI Ryan 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6% 1%
75 ANDRADE Cedric 6% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
76 YU ZiRun (Kinton) - - 3% 13% 30% 36% 17%
77 LEE Christopher 1% 10% 30% 37% 18% 4% -
77 CROWDER Job christoph - - 4% 25% 44% 26% 1%
79 TANG Brayden 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
80 ZHANG Jayden - 3% 16% 36% 32% 12% 1%
81 QU Zhida (richard) - 2% 18% 42% 30% 8% 1%
81 OH Christopher - 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 2%
83 AHN Theodore 7% 30% 37% 20% 5% - -
84 GUO Austin 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1% -
85 LIU Landon 8% 40% 37% 13% 2% - -
86 CHEN Kurtis 1% 12% 38% 36% 12% 1% -
87 BHARDWAJ Ranbir 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
88 XU Ethan - 5% 22% 39% 26% 7% -
89 SYMMANK Callen 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 2% -
90 SAFTA Aidan 1% 11% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
91 KUANG Cyrus - 6% 22% 35% 27% 9% 1%
92 GUDIMETLA Siddhanth 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2% -
92 OZCAN Archer 37% 43% 17% 3% - - -
94 POPOKH Luca 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 5% -
95 SHU Eric 30% 44% 22% 4% - - -
96 SLAIN Owen 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% -
97 LEONG Wilson Hua 4% 26% 45% 21% 4% - -
98 YANG Steve - 3% 16% 35% 33% 11% 1%
99 JIN Xueyuan George - 3% 20% 40% 31% 6% -
100 LI Aaron 5% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1% -
101 TEJAKUSUMA Eric 63% 32% 5% - - - -
102 NGUYEN Nolan 73% 24% 3% - - - -
103 CHEUNG Henry 38% 47% 13% 1% - - -
104 RAU Shogun 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1%
105 BHANOT Arjun 6% 35% 39% 17% 3% -
106 ALCAZAREN Cian 24% 43% 27% 6% - -
107 CHEN Jason 4% 17% 32% 29% 14% 3% -
108 WU Gengze (Daniel) 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
109 TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin 1% 11% 31% 35% 18% 4% -
110 KWONG Colin 21% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
111 GANAPATHI Eshan 2% 13% 30% 34% 18% 3% -
112 CHEN Owen 4% 30% 39% 20% 5% 1% -
112 SHA Laien 21% 46% 28% 5% - - -
114 BHANGOO Arman 37% 47% 14% 1% - - -
115 LIU Aiden 16% 42% 31% 9% 1% - -
116 WEI-NAVARRO Augustus 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
117 LI Jake 7% 29% 39% 20% 4% - -
118 MAO Runxian 2% 20% 40% 28% 9% 1% -
119 WONG Connor 24% 43% 25% 7% 1% - -
120 ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz 10% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
121 MAZAHERI John 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
121 DING Sam 4% 33% 40% 18% 4% - -
123 SHENOY sean 8% 33% 38% 18% 3% - -
124 LEE Ian 33% 42% 20% 4% - - -
125 LEE Joshua 6% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1% -
126 DANIEL Nikith 15% 38% 32% 12% 2% -
127 LI Austin 69% 27% 4% - - - -
127 CHOI Andrew 38% 41% 17% 3% - - -
129 ZHANG Yankai - 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
130 SHADRAVAN Arash 9% 47% 35% 8% 1% - -
131 MAZAHERI Theodore 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
132 LAM Kirin 20% 42% 28% 9% 1% - -
133 LIN Alden 24% 40% 26% 8% 1% - -
134 CHEN Aiden 56% 34% 8% 1% - - -
135 FEDOR Lucian 63% 31% 5% - - -
135 FU Owen 8% 32% 39% 18% 2% -
137 FERREYRA Emilio 1% 12% 39% 39% 8% 1% -
138 CHENG Alvin 13% 38% 34% 12% 2% - -
138 YUEN Landon 4% 29% 48% 17% 2% - -
140 SCHOR William 67% 29% 4% - - - -
140 SCHAMP Eliot 27% 48% 22% 3% - - -
142 CHEN Ryker 1% 13% 35% 35% 14% 2% -
142 QIU Yiran 73% 24% 3% - - - -
144 LEE Conrad 12% 33% 33% 17% 4% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.