Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% |
| 2 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
| 3 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 5 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | |
| 6 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 6 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 8 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 9 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 10 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | |
| 11 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | 4% |
| 12 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 13 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 14 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 11% | |
| 15 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | PIESNER Joshua C. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 18 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
| 19 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 21 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
| 22 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | CHEN Christopher | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 25 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | 29% | 5% | |
| 26 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 92% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 28 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 29 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 3% | |
| 30 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 32 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 95% | 64% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 34 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 35 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | MO Jason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 37 | LI Peihong | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | CHI Alexander | 100% | 76% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 41 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | ZHENG Zhe | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.