Liacouras Center - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YASSEEN Mohamed Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | ELSAYED Mohamed Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | WU Joey Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | V | V | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 5 | GAO Daniel | V V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 6 | MARAKOV Allen | D V | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
| 7 | RHYU Kozmo | V | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 | |
| 8 | MISHIMA Torata Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | YUROVCHAK Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | CLICK Aiden | V | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
| 11 | KIM Darius Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | GYURE Brayden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V V | V V | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 14 | GRAMS Steven Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | INSLER Ethan | D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
| 16 | NIKOLOV Peter | D | V | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 17 | SENNEWALD Frederick Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | KIM Derek Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | CHANG Baron Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | GANA Jorge | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
| 21 | LIEF Isaac | V | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 22 | HEARNE Gavin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | SMITH Nicholas | D V | V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 24 | WILCOX Xander Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | PECH Giulio Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | YU Colin | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
| 27 | YOUNG Peyton Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | JIN Nicholas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | LIPPMAN Eli Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | ROUBAILO Niels | V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 31 | KUMAR Aidan | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 32 | SAKO Ayrton Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | MURPHY Thomas | V | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 | |
| 34 | CHEN Eric | V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 35 | TUMIBAY Noah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | SERAFIN Ben Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | MARRAN Erik Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | JAYENDRA Shekar Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | HUANG Thomas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | ZAFFT Maximo | V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 41 | TOWNSEND Avery | D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 42 | MCADOO Declan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | ROBINS Brennan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | DAO Matthew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | VELUVALI Vivek Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | CHO Tyler | D V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 | |
| 47 | HASSAN Sultan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 49 | FUSSMAN Yuval | D V V | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 | |
| 50 | GREEN Ummi | D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 51 | YAVOROVSKI Joshua | V V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 52 | CHAVEZ GARCIA Ismael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | BONOMO Sebastian | D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 54 | KAMBESELES Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | LOYOLA Padick Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | WILLIAM Lehr Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 57 | PARKER Riley Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | GREEN Jabreel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | JOSEPH William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | ANDREEV Arthur | V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 61 | MUGA Boris Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 61 | ZHAO Luhan | D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 63 | BAILEY David Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 64 | LEE Matthew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 65 | WONG Nicholas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 66 | CLAYTON Robert Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 67 | PENA Ethan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 68 | FLECKENSTIEN Benjamin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 69 | RIBAS Fernando Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 70 | NEEMAN Benjamin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 70 | SCAPICCHIO Stephen Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 72 | NGUYEN Damien Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 72 | KANG Michael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 74 | ROSENBERG Jacob Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 75 | HARDAWAY William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 76 | ELRASHIDY Marawan | V D D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
| 77 | SCHARF Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 78 | LOPEZ Alexander Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 78 | RASSEL John Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 80 | CULLEN Reilly Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 81 | CUI Bo Lang (Oscar) Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 82 | TOPAZ Nicholas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 83 | NEWTON Gunnar Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 84 | MARTINEZ Jose Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 85 | GUIDANGEN Jason Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 85 | CONNELLY Scott Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 87 | BLACK Brennan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 88 | ROSKELLEY Luke Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 88 | GOCKE Nicholas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 90 | MANITT Philip Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 91 | JOHNS Raymond Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 92 | YAMAMOTO Raphael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 92 | SCOTT Jake Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 92 | SPECTER Luka Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 95 | TURNER Sahij Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 95 | CLARKE Rowan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 97 | NARANJO Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 97 | SHEN Zenan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 97 | SHANNON Henry Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 97 | LESHER Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 101 | ROSSHIRT Alexander Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 101 | ZHU Steve Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 103 | EWING Casey Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 104 | NEPOMUCENO Elijah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.