Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 2 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 3 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
| 3 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 5 | PAINE Jared A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% |
| 6 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 7 | LO Hung Yui | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
| 8 | XIAO Zherui | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
| 9 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 5% | |
| 10 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 11 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 12 | MARRAN Erik R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 13 | PARNAS Apollo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
| 14 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 9% | |
| 15 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 16 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | |
| 17 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 18 | POCSVEILER Magor | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | COOPER Rowan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
| 21 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 26% | 4% | |
| 22 | DIB Aaniss | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 8% | |
| 23 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
| 24 | CRANE Matthew T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 25 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | GOLDMAN Rami | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | GREGORY Dean | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 29 | JUSCINSKI Michal | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | HAN David | 100% | 99% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | PARNAS Ely | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | ZHANG Yu | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | KIM Edward J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
| 35 | PHAM Ian Q. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | OBERLEITON Timothy | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | LI Sui Lun | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | JACKSON James | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | LIU Yichen | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MARTIN Dirk | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | WISE Timothy | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 47 | ZHANG Zan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 49 | HONG James | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | CHRISTIAN Alexander | 100% | 92% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | REITINGER Luke M. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | CHEN Zhong Han | 100% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.