Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LI Matthew | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
2 | CHEN Hanson | V V V V V D | V V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | TANG Alexander L. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | D V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
5 | LU Andy | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
6 | BORKOWSKI Olgierd | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
7 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | V D V V V D | V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
8 | GHEDINI Luca | V D V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
9 | JURMAN Therin | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
10 | TANG August L. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
11 | CHANG Jonathan | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
12 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER thomas | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
13 | HUA Aaron | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
14 | TANG Terry | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
15 | CHENG Ethan | V V D D V V | V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
16 | SIMONOV Timofey | D V V V D | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
17 | DESERANNO Leander | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
17 | CHA James | V V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
19 | WANG Rory | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
20 | CHO Jadon Yushin | V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
21 | LEE Jonah | V V V V V D | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
22 | JIMENEZ Naveen | V V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
23 | SHENG Dalton | V V D V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
24 | SHAPIRO Leon | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | CHOI Benjamin | V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
26 | TOOMRE Kai | V D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
27 | CHENG Logan | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
28 | AKYAMAC Bora | V V V D V D | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
29 | BELOKON Sammy | V V D D V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
30 | HUANG Eythan | V V D D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
31 | CHO Xzander | V D V D V D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
32 | HAN Alexander | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
33 | SENANI Arjun | V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
34 | FANG Haoyu | V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
35 | ZHENG Marcus | V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
36 | LATORRE Leonardo | V V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
37 | TEH Tang-Ngu | V V D V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
38 | ZHANG Hanru | V V V D V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
39 | XU Nathan | V V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
40 | HOLLIS Sean | V D V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
41 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | D V D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
42 | DOELL Ethan | V V V D D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
43 | JIN Daniel | V V D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
44 | JIN Andy | V D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
45 | SURESH Rohan | D V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
46 | FENG Michael | D V V D V D | V D | 5.3 | 3 | -2.3 |
47 | WONG Jacob W. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
48 | QIAN Zekai | D D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
49 | ABRAMKIN Tim | D D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
50 | HOLMES Alexiy | D D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
51 | GRUNENWALD Henri | D D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
52 | HOU Gaven | V D D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
53 | PLUMMER Waylon | D V V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
53 | GE Felix Fei | V V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
55 | CHEN kenneth | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
56 | MARTIN Darius | D D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
57 | BAI Austin | D D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
58 | KUO Phineas | D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
59 | WEI JR Shan | D V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
60 | XIE Jicheng | V D D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
61 | BELCHAMBER Mason | V D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
62 | QU Richard | D V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
63 | ZHANG Andrew | D D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
64 | LEE Junehyuk | D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
65 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | D D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
66 | KAYE Ben | V V D D D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
67 | HUANG Nathan | D D V D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
68 | ZHAO Ryan | V D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
69 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | V D D V D D | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
70 | ONIK Ari N. | D D D V V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
71 | FOGELSON Hugh | D V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
72 | ZHENG Austin | D V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
73 | KAGAN Noah | D D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
74 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | D D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
75 | REYES Yannik | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
76 | HUYNH Matthew | D D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
77 | POLEPALLI Vinil | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
78 | LEONG Samuel | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
79 | KOVACS Harrison | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
80 | CHINN Callum | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
81 | LEE Aeden | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
82 | CHOW Kingsley | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
83 | FALCONE Jack | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
84 | GATES Combustion | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
85 | COUAILLIER Leo | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
85 | YOUM Tyson | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
87 | LIANG Haojia | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
88 | WANG Luke | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
88 | LIU Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
90 | PERKINS Nathaniel | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
91 | HU Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
91 | NAM Justin | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
93 | ZHANG Ethan | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
94 | FRIEDMAN Marcus | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.