Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men's Foil

Sunday, December 1, 2024 at 12:00 PM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LI Matthew - - - - 2% 23% 75%
2 CHEN Hanson - - 1% 5% 23% 43% 28%
3 TANG Alexander L. - - 1% 6% 25% 44% 24%
3 MATTOS Luis Felipe - 3% 16% 35% 33% 11% 1%
5 LU Andy - 2% 10% 27% 35% 21% 4%
6 BORKOWSKI Olgierd - - 3% 19% 45% 33%
7 MAZAHERI Fletcher - - - 5% 23% 43% 29%
8 GHEDINI Luca - - 2% 10% 31% 40% 17%
9 JURMAN Therin - - 3% 17% 37% 33% 10%
10 TANG August L. - - - 1% 6% 31% 63%
11 CHANG Jonathan - - 1% 10% 36% 41% 13%
12 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER thomas - - 1% 11% 34% 41% 14%
13 HUA Aaron - 1% 7% 25% 39% 25% 4%
14 TANG Terry - 1% 9% 27% 38% 21% 4%
15 CHENG Ethan - - - 1% 11% 38% 50%
16 SIMONOV Timofey - - 3% 22% 52% 22%
17 DESERANNO Leander - - 1% 11% 40% 42% 6%
17 CHA James - 4% 23% 38% 27% 8% 1%
19 WANG Rory - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
20 CHO Jadon Yushin - - 1% 8% 40% 51%
21 LEE Jonah - - - 2% 16% 43% 38%
22 JIMENEZ Naveen - - 2% 14% 41% 35% 8%
23 SHENG Dalton - - - 1% 14% 43% 41%
24 SHAPIRO Leon - - 3% 21% 45% 31%
25 CHOI Benjamin - 3% 16% 38% 34% 9%
26 TOOMRE Kai - 5% 18% 33% 30% 12% 1%
27 CHENG Logan - 1% 7% 27% 40% 22% 4%
28 AKYAMAC Bora - - - 4% 21% 45% 30%
29 BELOKON Sammy 1% 7% 25% 40% 24% 4%
30 HUANG Eythan - - 5% 27% 46% 22%
31 CHO Xzander - 1% 6% 24% 38% 26% 5%
32 HAN Alexander - 3% 15% 33% 32% 14% 2%
33 SENANI Arjun - 9% 40% 37% 12% 1%
34 FANG Haoyu - 2% 20% 43% 29% 6%
35 ZHENG Marcus - 3% 21% 44% 27% 5%
36 LATORRE Leonardo 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
37 TEH Tang-Ngu - 3% 19% 37% 30% 10% 1%
38 ZHANG Hanru - 1% 9% 29% 38% 20% 4%
39 XU Nathan - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
40 HOLLIS Sean - 1% 10% 29% 37% 19% 3%
41 YEVDAYEV Tamir 6% 28% 38% 21% 5% 1% -
42 DOELL Ethan - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 19%
43 JIN Daniel 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
44 JIN Andy 3% 17% 38% 34% 8% 1%
45 SURESH Rohan - - 5% 24% 45% 23% 2%
46 FENG Michael - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
47 WONG Jacob W. - 1% 12% 32% 36% 16% 2%
48 QIAN Zekai 3% 20% 43% 28% 6% - -
49 ABRAMKIN Tim - 3% 15% 31% 33% 15% 2%
50 HOLMES Alexiy - 6% 25% 43% 22% 3% -
51 GRUNENWALD Henri 3% 19% 38% 29% 10% 1% -
52 HOU Gaven - 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3%
53 PLUMMER Waylon 11% 33% 36% 17% 4% - -
53 GE Felix Fei - 4% 24% 41% 25% 6% -
55 CHEN kenneth 8% 31% 40% 19% 2% -
56 MARTIN Darius - - 6% 29% 45% 20%
57 BAI Austin 4% 23% 44% 24% 5% -
58 KUO Phineas 4% 23% 40% 26% 7% 1%
59 WEI JR Shan 1% 7% 29% 42% 18% 3% -
60 XIE Jicheng - 8% 34% 38% 16% 3% -
61 BELCHAMBER Mason 1% 7% 25% 37% 23% 6% -
62 QU Richard 4% 21% 37% 27% 9% 1% -
63 ZHANG Andrew 24% 47% 24% 4% - -
64 LEE Junehyuk 17% 41% 31% 9% 1% -
65 POLEBOYINA Amrit 1% 13% 37% 34% 13% 2% -
66 KAYE Ben 20% 44% 29% 7% 1% - -
67 HUANG Nathan 19% 42% 30% 8% 1% -
68 ZHAO Ryan 6% 26% 38% 24% 6% 1% -
69 RODRIGUEZ Tyler - - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10%
70 ONIK Ari N. 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
71 FOGELSON Hugh 7% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1% -
72 ZHENG Austin 15% 49% 28% 7% 1% - -
73 KAGAN Noah 12% 52% 29% 6% 1% - -
74 JAZWINSKI Ryan 5% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
75 REYES Yannik 12% 58% 25% 4% - -
76 HUYNH Matthew 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
77 POLEPALLI Vinil 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
78 LEONG Samuel 13% 34% 33% 16% 4% - -
79 KOVACS Harrison 7% 31% 41% 18% 3% - -
80 CHINN Callum 7% 33% 38% 18% 4% - -
81 LEE Aeden 38% 45% 15% 2% - - -
82 CHOW Kingsley 37% 46% 15% 2% - - -
83 FALCONE Jack 19% 42% 30% 8% 1% -
84 GATES Combustion 36% 46% 16% 2% - -
85 COUAILLIER Leo 28% 48% 20% 3% - - -
85 YOUM Tyson 51% 38% 10% 1% - - -
87 LIANG Haojia 23% 48% 25% 4% - - -
88 WANG Luke 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
88 LIU Ryan 29% 45% 22% 4% - - -
90 PERKINS Nathaniel 75% 23% 1% - - -
91 HU Daniel 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
91 NAM Justin 68% 29% 3% - - - -
93 ZHANG Ethan 28% 44% 23% 5% - -
94 FRIEDMAN Marcus 59% 35% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.