Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% |
| 2 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 35% |
| 3 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 3 | DUKO Phillip | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 5 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 6 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 7 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% |
| 8 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 9 | HU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 10 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 11 | GAO Victor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
| 13 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 14 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | |
| 15 | ZHAI Avalo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 16 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% | 7% |
| 18 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 4% |
| 19 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
| 20 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 14% |
| 21 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
| 23 | CLARE James | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | ZHAO Liren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 3% |
| 26 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | KIM Zac | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | STARKIE Kitteridge | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LI Ray | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 89% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | WANG Charles | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 33 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 34 | WANG Tony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 35 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 36 | SONG Changze | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 14% | |
| 37 | SCHAUER Oliver | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 18% |
| 39 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 9% |
| 40 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 41 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 42 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 43 | LYCHKO Maksym | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 45 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 1% |
| 48 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 49 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | YANG Alex | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 51 | WARD Kofi | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 52 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 54 | THOMAS Ethan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | LI Morgan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 56 | HE Bronto | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 57 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 58 | WENG ZOE | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | XIAO Yichen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 60 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | ACAR Devin | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 62 | BOUCHACOURT Arthur | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 63 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | HEMPHILL Kurt | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 65 | CUK Max | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | BAZZANA Benji | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 67 | NG Nico | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 68 | LEE Henry | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 69 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 70 | LEE Wyatt | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 71 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 72 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 73 | DAVIS Kannon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 74 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 75 | HENNESSY Levon | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 76 | ZHAI Christopher | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | LEE Kalvin | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | GREEN Logan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 79 | YU David | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | GIMBRERE Alexandre | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | O'KEEFE Grady | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 82 | AGUIRRE Pablo | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 85 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | MEYERSON Ashton | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 87 | WANG Eason | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | CHANG Ian | 100% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | BARATY Teagan | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.