Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Eden | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% | |
| 2 | CHEN Madeline | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 3 | YANG Hannah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 3 | NING Miranda | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 5 | YARBILOVA Aya | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
| 6 | HOWARD Katherine | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 7 | KIM Abigail | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 8 | CHEN Laila | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
| 9 | MOKRETSOV Leah | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 10 | KAKANI Aditi | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 10% |
| 11 | GOFMAN Anastasia | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 12 | HAN Emma | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 13 | XIE ANDREA | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% | |
| 14 | XU Mulan | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% | |
| 15 | NIKOLLA Vivienne | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 16 | ZHANG Ashley | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 17 | KOUAME Candice | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 18 | HALL Sophie | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 19 | AINSWORTH Esme | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | MEGGERS Arya | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 21 | ZHANG Audrey | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | KIM Charlotte | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | CHEN Allison | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | GRUDZINSKI Josephine | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | ALLIEVI Simone | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 26 | ZHAO Crystal | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 4% | |
| 27 | ZHAO Rachel | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | SAJJA Anwita | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 29 | CHOI Noah | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | LEE Iona | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | DONE Kennedy | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | KUO Stella | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 33 | LAW Mila | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 10% | |
| 34 | LAI Juliet | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | RICHARDS Seren | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 36 | ERATA Selena | 14% | 54% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | LUO MAOSHUEN | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | WARD Imani | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | SIU Mila | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 40 | NG Catherine | - | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
| 41 | BONDE Trisha | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | CHEN Reina | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 43 | MAO Faith | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 44 | WANG Katherine | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | LIANG Kristy | 2% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | QI Chelsie | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 10% |
| 47 | LI Juliana | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 48 | TANG Jacquelyn | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 49 | KANDHI Aryaa | - | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
| 50 | CHANG Emma | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 51 | LEE Zoe | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | CHO Josephine | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 53 | NG Victoria | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | MAEDJE Abigail | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 55 | BORODEN Aubrielle | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | CARACCIOLO Emma | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | ZHU Kaylee | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | LOUGH Abbie | 67% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | SHI Emma | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.