Fencers Club Inc. - New York, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SCHUMACHER Cooper | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 2 | LIOU Solomon | D D D V D D | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 1 | -3.3 |
| 3 | LAWSON Henry | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 3 | HENSAL Nicolas | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 5 | SANDERS Ian | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | LAWSON Nicholas | V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | MANN Jake | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 8 | GRIFFITHS Ryan | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 9 | XIA Dashan | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 11 | HILBERT Xavier | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 12 | KAULL James | V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 13 | SU Caleb | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 14 | CHEIAN Dinis | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 15 | SERAFIN Ben | V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 16 | GAO Daniel | V D V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 17 | TSE Maxwell | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | HILBERT Gabriel | V V D V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 19 | KOKENGE Reid | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | STEVENS Daniel | D V V D V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 21 | REPIC Oliver | V V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 22 | SETO Jing | D V V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 23 | MAO Benjamin | V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 24 | GANA Jorge | V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 25 | SHIFRON Daniel | D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 26 | OGBORN Teddy | V D V D D | V | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 27 | MISHIMA Torata | D D V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 28 | CHEN YiHeng | V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 29 | DOUBOV Andrew | D D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | WONG Maximus | V D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 31 | KOEPPEL Levi | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | RIM Eugene | V D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 33 | CHEN Leonardo | V V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 34 | FULLER George | V D V V D V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 35 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | D V D V V V | D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 36 | WONG King-Yee | V D V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 37 | KARIMOV Amir | D V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 38 | CHOI Joong Kyung | V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 39 | CLARE James | V D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 40 | FERRAIOLO James | D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 41 | MILLER Owen | D D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 42 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano | D D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 43 | IYER Ganapathi | V D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 44 | LIU Fengqi | D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 45 | BLAKESLEE Ian | V D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 46 | BLAKESLEE Garrett | V V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 48 | NESTERCZUK Maddox | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 49 | TABLEMAN Doug | D D D V D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 50 | MILLER Luke | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 51 | CHOI Paul | D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 51 | FEAGIN Patrick | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 53 | HU Robert | D D V D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 54 | NILSEN Mark | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 55 | CHEN Edward | D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 56 | FRIEDMAN Andres | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 57 | LIN Nathan | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 58 | ZHU Steve | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 59 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 60 | TANG Jeremy | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.