Fencers Club Inc. - New York, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHUMACHER Cooper | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% | |
| 2 | LIOU Solomon | - | < 1% | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 3 | LAWSON Henry | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 75% |
| 3 | HENSAL Nicolas | - | 1% | 15% | 42% | 35% | 7% | |
| 5 | SANDERS Ian | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
| 6 | LAWSON Nicholas | - | - | - | 1% | 27% | 72% | |
| 7 | MANN Jake | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 36% | 6% | |
| 8 | GRIFFITHS Ryan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 9 | XIA Dashan | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 11 | HILBERT Xavier | - | - | 5% | 28% | 46% | 21% | |
| 12 | KAULL James | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% | |
| 13 | SU Caleb | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 14 | CHEIAN Dinis | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 38% | 5% |
| 15 | SERAFIN Ben | - | 5% | 30% | 44% | 20% | 1% | |
| 16 | GAO Daniel | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 31% | 6% | |
| 17 | TSE Maxwell | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | HILBERT Gabriel | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 35% | 7% |
| 19 | KOKENGE Reid | - | 1% | 20% | 45% | 30% | 4% | |
| 20 | STEVENS Daniel | - | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 39% | 9% |
| 21 | REPIC Oliver | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | SETO Jing | 5% | 30% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | MAO Benjamin | 1% | 10% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | GANA Jorge | - | - | 2% | 18% | 62% | 18% | |
| 25 | SHIFRON Daniel | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 33% | |
| 26 | OGBORN Teddy | - | 5% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
| 27 | MISHIMA Torata | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 28 | CHEN YiHeng | 11% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | DOUBOV Andrew | - | 6% | 32% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 30 | WONG Maximus | 1% | 12% | 41% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | KOEPPEL Levi | 6% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | RIM Eugene | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | CHEN Leonardo | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | FULLER George | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 35 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | WONG King-Yee | 11% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | KARIMOV Amir | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | CHOI Joong Kyung | - | 3% | 24% | 45% | 26% | 2% | |
| 39 | CLARE James | 16% | 51% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | FERRAIOLO James | 17% | 41% | 33% | 9% | - | - | |
| 41 | MILLER Owen | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 43 | IYER Ganapathi | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | LIU Fengqi | 45% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 45 | BLAKESLEE Ian | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | BLAKESLEE Garrett | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | NESTERCZUK Maddox | 28% | 56% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | TABLEMAN Doug | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 33% | 4% | |
| 50 | MILLER Luke | 14% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | CHOI Paul | - | 3% | 26% | 45% | 24% | 2% | |
| 51 | FEAGIN Patrick | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | HU Robert | - | 6% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 54 | NILSEN Mark | 38% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | CHEN Edward | 40% | 52% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | FRIEDMAN Andres | 40% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | LIN Nathan | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | ZHU Steve | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | 55% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | TANG Jeremy | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.