The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHOI Zachary | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 40% |
| 2 | CHEN zhuoyang | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 48% | 26% |
| 3 | GOROZA Eric | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 3 | RICHARD silas | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% | |
| 5 | LEVENTAL Mark | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 24% | |
| 6 | WANG Devin | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 7 | AVETISIAN Alexander | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 8 | LOUIE Joseph | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 9 | ROBINSON Samuel | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 10 | WU Steven | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 11 | SIM Ian | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 12 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
| 13 | GACIOCH Noah | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 14 | GUO Luke | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | WU Eric | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | MCLAREN Mason | 3% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 17 | JAO Aaron | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 18 | KIM Ian | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | LI Grayson | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | HSU Joshua | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 21 | MEHROTRA Neel | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 22 | LEUNG Dylan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | LIU Max | 2% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 25 | MA Ryan | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | GUO Woody | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 27 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 28 | GREENMAN Duke | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | ZHANG Luqi | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | SHIN Ryan | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 8% | |
| 31 | FAN Jordan | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | AVETISIAN Michael | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 33 | REICHMANN Theo | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | WONG Benjamin | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | HU Jingsen | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | YAO Tristan | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | DILEEP Roshan | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | TOPPING Axel | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | TAMAYO-SARVER Daniel | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | TANG Zheng | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | KIM Remington | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | ZHAO Colin | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | DENG Andes | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | CHU Theodore | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.