Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 2 | XIAO Zherui | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 3 | CUMMINGS Kai W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% |
| 3 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 5 | LAWLER Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 6 | BARRY Dominick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 7 | CHIEN Zachary M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 8 | MAKMATOV Vadim | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 9 | DAVIS Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 10 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 11 | NIXON Christian A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | RODNEY Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Derek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 15 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 17 | MUNOZ Charles O. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 91% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | WILMER Nik | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 20 | NGUYEN Steven | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 21 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
| 22 | PERSAUD Daivik | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 23 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | HAN David | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | WESTMAAS Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 4% |
| 27 | YAO Shun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | JONES Dominic R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 29 | SMAY II Joseph E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | POSTMA Jacob | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | CHIZ Max H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 32 | KOERBER Christopher T. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | ZHAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 34 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 35 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | RICHARDSON Victor | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | BARAFF David | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 42 | BURCH Tristan H. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | SCHWARY Irv | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | SPENCER Richard (Spenc) E. | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | KUHN Jeffrey | 100% | 95% | 66% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 47 | FLY Paul | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | TRAN Travis | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 50 | LIN Austin S. | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | RHEA Eric L. | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | WHITE Chance N. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.