NEUSFA 2019 Pomme De Terre Individual

Senior Men's Épée

Saturday, June 15, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Brandeis University, Gosman Sports Center - Waltham, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HONDOR Robert D. 100% 100% 97% 87% 61% 29% 6%
2 FEINBERG Gabriel M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 50%
3 VERMEULE Spencer 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36%
3 KIM Juni C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 50%
5 MACZIK Adam W. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 29%
6 JONES Tristan Kai 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 77%
7 PHO Eric 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 3%
8 LUKANYUK Lorence 100% 97% 80% 45% 14% 1%
9 YU Colin 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 31%
10 STUSNICK Hunter 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 23%
11 ROGAK Benjamin A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 16%
12 HAMPTON Maxwell (Max) 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 42% 10%
13 PAOLINI Nathan R. 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 16%
14 GREGORY Abram 100% 100% 93% 64% 24% 4%
15 YUROVCHAK Andrew T. 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 33% 5%
16 ROUSE Brian G. 100% 100% 98% 87% 61% 27% 5%
17 SANTOS Cameron A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 46% 10%
18 JONES Simon A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 14%
20 ADAMIAN Nathaniel S. 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 33% 6%
21 LEIGH David A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 39%
22 DOLMETSCH Max 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 5% -
23 MAZZOLI Julio C. 100% 100% 99% 84% 45% 9%
24 HOLTZ Donovan K. 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 10%
25 MECHKOV Iliya 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 13%
26 GONZALEZ TABORDA William Eulogio 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 34% 7%
27 ZAFFT Maximo 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 17% 3%
28 BIXBY Solomon J. 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 41% 8%
29 CORBAN Michael Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 46%
30 LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 21% 1%
31 OLIVERIUS Joseph W. 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 6%
32 KRONROD Tal 100% 98% 86% 58% 26% 6% 1%
33 MORSE Tyler 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 9%
34 PEDERSEN Christopher C. 100% 100% 97% 77% 37% 7% < 1%
35 MAISEL Simon F. 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 27% 5%
36 ARMSTRONG Chris 100% 100% 97% 82% 51% 19% 3%
37 BOWERMAN Lucas A. 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 30% 5%
38 HITCHCOCK David 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 66% 18%
39 MELCHER Jack H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 42%
40 TROAKE Henry R. 100% 94% 71% 35% 10% 1% -
41 CHARRON Jack H. 100% 96% 78% 45% 16% 3% -
43 BOYNTON Zachariah (Zach) G. 100% 97% 84% 55% 23% 5% 1%
44 GARCIA-ALBEA Javier 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 48% 10%
45 JOHNSON Evan 100% 98% 87% 59% 26% 6% 1%
46 INSLER Ethan C. 100% 93% 68% 32% 8% 1%
47 FERREIRA Noah J. 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 4%
48 ANDREEV Arthur 100% 100% 97% 80% 44% 11%
49 TORDO Garrett 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 8%
50 MARCHANT Albert 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4% -
51 ABELE Chris 100% 94% 69% 33% 9% 1% -
52 SUMLER Jeffery 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 21% 3%
53 FELDMAN Jaemin 100% 95% 73% 37% 10% 1%
54 WYATT Seth 100% 98% 84% 51% 18% 3%
55 YOSHIDA Stephen R. 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 20% 1%
56 ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. 100% 93% 64% 26% 5% 1% -
57 MCDERMOTT James E. 100% 96% 64% 20% 3% - -
57 JIN Owen 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 10% 1%
59 BIXBY Peter W. 100% 90% 60% 26% 7% 1% -
60 HARRIS Robert S. 100% 100% 97% 75% 33% 5% -
61 CULLER Michael (Mike) D. 100% 99% 89% 60% 23% 4% -
62 CARVALHO Daniel 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 8% 1%
63 STANKEVICZ Timothy G. 100% 91% 53% 10% 1% - -
64 BURKE Matthew 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 14% 2%
65 THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. 100% 99% 86% 55% 21% 3%
66 BUSH Thomas 100% 96% 76% 40% 12% 1%
67 O'BRIEN Timothy S. 100% 90% 61% 26% 6% 1% -
68 JANOSKI Stephen M. 100% 99% 89% 59% 23% 4% -
69 SHEPARD Zachary 100% 96% 79% 46% 17% 3% -
70 PATENAUDE Kameron 100% 91% 48% 12% 1% - -
71 HOWELL Thomas A. 100% 99% 91% 65% 31% 8% 1%
72 TUCKER Owen J. 100% 100% 96% 74% 28% 4% -
73 WALTING Paul J. 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 16% 2%
74 GERSEN Jacob 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
75 LAI Coby 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% - -
76 MCDERMOTT Brian 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 19% 2%
77 BURKE Cyril 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 23% 4%
78 COLLYMORE Spencer T. 100% 100% 96% 72% 30% 5%
79 SHAH Maximilian A. 100% 81% 40% 11% 2% -
80 DOUGLAS Colin F. 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 17% 2%
81 MA Shuhe 100% 94% 69% 33% 9% 1% -
82 KAIN Brad 100% 57% 16% 2% - - -
83 MARSHALL William L. 100% 86% 51% 19% 4% - -
83 FENWICK Luke A. 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 9% 1%
85 SANTOS Felipe 100% 98% 82% 49% 18% 3% -
86 PARTE Aidan 100% 43% 6% - - -
87 PAUL Max A. 100% 98% 85% 52% 19% 4% -
88 MARKHAM Jimmy 100% 99% 89% 62% 28% 7% 1%
89 HU Jansen T. 100% 90% 60% 26% 6% 1% -
90 JENNINGS Adin 100% 64% 18% 2% - - -
91 LIU Kenneth 100% 93% 63% 24% 4% - -
92 EGAN Edward L. 100% 92% 62% 24% 5% - -
93 ZHANG Franklin 100% 40% 7% - - - -
94 ADAMIAN David 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
95 HOUST Michael D. 100% 98% 83% 44% 10% 1% -
96 GREELEY Shawn 100% 84% 44% 13% 2% - -
97 BAZURO Andrew 100% 78% 40% 12% 2% - -
98 CONNORS Jacob 100% 77% 36% 9% 1% - -
99 JANKOWICH Alexander E. 100% 83% 45% 14% 2% - -
100 WU Joseph 100% 89% 46% 10% 1% - -
101 MACKIN Samuel 100% 82% 43% 13% 2% -
102 SIMPSON Patrick 100% 94% 61% 21% 3% - -
103 SIDDIQUI Humza K. 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% -
104 HERMANSON David B. 100% 82% 29% 5% - -
105 TODREAS Simon 100% 98% 85% 53% 20% 4% -
106 ORODENKER Aiden M. 100% 72% 28% 6% 1% - -
107 MAROOTIAN Alex S. 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 4% -
108 BOISLARD Jacob R. 100% 64% 19% 3% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.