New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RUSADZE Nickolas | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | MIALL Steven A. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | PO Oliver | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | LEE Jacob J | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | CATINO Brennen | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 6 | LI Yao (Liam) | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 7 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | GUO Justin | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 9 | WANG Mason | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 10 | LEE Jonah | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 11 | WANG Jackson | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 12 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 13 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | V V V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 14 | ZHOU Leon | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 15 | LI Aaron | D D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 16 | LI Ayren | V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | CHENG Ethan | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 18 | LIU Derek | D V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 19 | LIU Ryan | V V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 20 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | D D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 21 | JIA Jing Yu | V V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 22 | XIAO Benjamin | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | XU Ethan | D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | SIMA Congyu | V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | CAO Ray | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | UNGERER Roger M. | D V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 27 | LEE Brendan | V D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 28 | JURMAN Therin | V V V D D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 29 | SHAO Eric | V D D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 30 | KLOTZ Isaiah | V V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 31 | SIMON Luke | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 32 | WEI Qian | D V D D D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 33 | GERRISH William | V V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 34 | ZHANG Aaron | V D V V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 35 | WONG Jacob W. | D V V D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 36 | WANG Julang | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 36 | LOGAN Kai | D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 38 | LU Jason | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 39 | DALBERG Anders | V D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 40 | SHIM Peter S. | D D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 41 | ZHANG Teddy | D D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 42 | CHUNG Ian | D D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 43 | LIU Jeremiah | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 44 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 45 | TAN Aidan | D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 46 | PALLADINO Ben | V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 47 | LEE Eugene | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 48 | ZHENG Harrison | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 49 | ZENG Rick | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 50 | CHOI Eugene | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 51 | YE Gavin | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 52 | CHA James | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 52 | SOLOPOULOS James | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 54 | BLEIL Tyler | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 55 | MARSHALL Henry | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 56 | MALHAM Andrew | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 57 | BANG Ian | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 57 | BANG Sian | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.