New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 2 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
| 3 | PO Oliver | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 3 | LEE Jacob J | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 5 | CATINO Brennen | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
| 6 | LI Yao (Liam) | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 7 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | - | 6% | 30% | 46% | 18% | |
| 8 | GUO Justin | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 9 | WANG Mason | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 8% |
| 10 | LEE Jonah | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 11 | WANG Jackson | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% |
| 12 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 13 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - | |
| 14 | ZHOU Leon | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 28% | 3% |
| 15 | LI Aaron | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
| 16 | LI Ayren | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
| 17 | CHENG Ethan | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 11% | |
| 18 | LIU Derek | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 19 | LIU Ryan | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 8% | - | |
| 20 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 21 | JIA Jing Yu | 3% | 23% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | XIAO Benjamin | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 23 | XU Ethan | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 7% | |
| 24 | SIMA Congyu | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
| 25 | CAO Ray | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 3% | |
| 26 | UNGERER Roger M. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | LEE Brendan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | JURMAN Therin | - | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 29 | SHAO Eric | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 30 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SIMON Luke | 3% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 32 | WEI Qian | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | GERRISH William | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | WONG Jacob W. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | WANG Julang | 8% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | LOGAN Kai | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 1% | |
| 38 | LU Jason | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | DALBERG Anders | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | SHIM Peter S. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | ZHANG Teddy | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CHUNG Ian | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LIU Jeremiah | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 35% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | TAN Aidan | 3% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | PALLADINO Ben | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 47 | LEE Eugene | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | ZHENG Harrison | 9% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | ZENG Rick | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | CHOI Eugene | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | YE Gavin | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CHA James | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 52 | SOLOPOULOS James | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 54 | BLEIL Tyler | 5% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | MARSHALL Henry | 7% | 40% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | MALHAM Andrew | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | BANG Ian | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | BANG Sian | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.