Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PECK Quinn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 30% | 2% |
| 2 | METZ Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% | |
| 3 | YU William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 3 | STRADOMSKYI Klim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 13% |
| 5 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 19% | |
| 6 | GODIN Willis | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
| 7 | SHEA William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 29% | |
| 8 | LACZIN Mark R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 9 | DUSZA Zachery | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 10 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 53% | |
| 11 | PRUT Anton | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
| 12 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 39% | 1% | |
| 13 | NAUGHTON Aidan | 100% | 91% | 49% | 10% | - | ||
| 14 | SHICK Veronika | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | 2% | |
| 15 | COSSROW Alex | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | CRAYTON Royce S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 17 | CHANG Zane | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | BERGMANN Beatrix | 100% | 78% | 31% | 4% | - | ||
| 19 | RUSANOV Oleg | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 43% | ||
| 20 | STANSBURY Desmond | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | WESTGATE Rebecca | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | CANDELARIA Armando | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | MOORE Addisyn | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | MACKAY Ian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 15% | 1% | |
| 25 | NOVOTNY Felicia A. | 100% | 94% | 54% | 9% | - | - | |
| 26 | JEROME Trevor | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 27 | RHEE Josiah | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | CHANG Xavier | 100% | 99% | 79% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 29 | TSENG Lucas | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
| 30 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 86% | 33% | ||
| 31 | DAVIS Connor | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | DONOHUE Peter | 100% | 95% | 64% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | MARTINEZ Rodrigo | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | FOOR Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 35 | MARKERT Delaney | 100% | 74% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 36 | MYERS Kenneth | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | COLEMAN Samantha | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | JAIN Dia | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 39 | SCHOEPFLE Carla | 100% | 72% | 16% | 1% | - | ||
| 40 | RAMBHARAT Kheamraj | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | STENSON Alyssa | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | HONG Nathan | 100% | 84% | 40% | 8% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.