Neil Lazar RYC/RJCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 8:15 AM

New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GOOR Julian 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36%
2 WU Jerry 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 50%
3 SHA Yi Peng 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 40%
3 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 55%
5 RUSADZE Nickolas 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 85% 43%
6 ALIMI Yacine A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 45% 9%
6 WU Alexander 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 14%
8 AHN Jun 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 21%
9 SHIN Joshua J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 21%
10 LEE Jacob J 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 36% 6%
11 ACHILOV Sayid 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 5%
12 TORRES Treston 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 29% 3%
13 HONG Issac 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 15%
14 GONG Benjamin 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 15%
15 SYOMICHEV Gleb A. 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 21% 3%
16 BOYLE Aiden P. 100% 97% 79% 41% 10% 1% -
17 MIALL Steven A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 32%
18 WANG Alex L. 100% 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 4%
19 DAVIDSON Elliot 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 7% 1%
20 TSAI Max W. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 14%
21 GAO Anthony 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
22 LI Eric 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 42%
23 WANG Jackson 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 8%
23 QI Steve 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5%
25 TRAUGOT Owen G. 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 7%
26 CATINO Brennen 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
27 SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 41% 7%
28 ORVANANOS Jorge 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 19%
29 XIAO Benjamin 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 12% 1%
30 WANG Mason 100% 100% 97% 80% 45% 13% 1%
31 YOON DYLAN 100% 99% 88% 61% 27% 6% 1%
32 VENKATESH Aditya 100% 85% 46% 13% 1% - -
33 JIN Dennis H. 100% 100% 93% 67% 29% 6% < 1%
34 LI Yao (Liam) 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 37% 7%
35 ZHONG Guoren 100% 100% 91% 55% 19% 3% -
36 SONG Bryan 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 15% 2%
37 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56% 10%
38 TALLARICO Matthew 100% 100% 98% 85% 48% 14% 1%
39 ZHAI Jeffrey 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 17%
40 MILLER Aidan A. 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 2%
41 LIGOS Alex M. 100% 97% 81% 47% 16% 3% -
42 PROMRAT Pete 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 5% -
43 GUO Justin 100% 100% 95% 74% 37% 10% 1%
44 LI Ayren 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 16% 2%
45 ZHOU Leon 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 19% 2%
46 SMOTROFF Joshua L. 100% 97% 78% 44% 15% 2% -
47 LORANGER Peter 100% 98% 82% 45% 13% 2% -
48 PLASTARAS Trey 100% 98% 83% 46% 14% 2% -
49 HU Jason 100% 94% 68% 27% 4% - -
50 XIANG Derrick 100% 100% 99% 87% 53% 17% 2%
51 DONG sean 100% 98% 85% 52% 18% 3% -
52 ZHEN Ethan 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 41% 8%
53 GOH William C. 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2% -
54 PELT Ethan T. 100% 74% 31% 7% 1% - -
55 MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. 100% 95% 69% 31% 8% 1% -
56 DONG Liangtong 100% 100% 97% 75% 34% 7% 1%
57 LIU Ryan 100% 93% 60% 21% 4% - -
58 MCQUIDE elliot 100% 63% 15% 2% - - -
59 DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. 100% 97% 78% 40% 10% 1% -
60 LEE Jonah 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 9% 1%
61 POPE Alexander 100% 94% 62% 21% 3% - -
62 LIU Charles 100% 91% 58% 19% 3% - -
63 XU Ethan 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 13% 1%
64 ZHENG Harrison 100% 42% 7% 1% - - -
65 LOGAN Kai 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
66 FRANK Amir 100% 89% 57% 22% 5% 1% -
67 MORGESON Colin 100% 71% 30% 7% 1% - -
68 DALBERG Anders 100% 95% 61% 22% 4% - -
69 ZHUANG Chuanxuan 100% 89% 54% 18% 3% - -
70 LUO liangzhao 100% 98% 86% 59% 26% 7% 1%
71 WANG Julang 100% 76% 34% 8% 1% - -
72 WEI Qian 100% 54% 11% 1% - - -
73 LU Jason 100% 98% 82% 47% 16% 3% -
74 BANG Ian 100% 42% 6% - - - -
75 YOU Alex 100% 80% 39% 11% 1% - -
76 HOLCOMB Cedric 100% 45% 9% 1% - - -
77 BRATTAIN Trey 100% 97% 77% 34% 3% - -
78 GREENLEAF Paul 100% 95% 70% 33% 8% 1% -
79 TING Clement 100% 59% 9% - - - -
80 KIMBALL Curtis 100% 93% 67% 32% 9% 1% -
81 MOORE Evan 100% 94% 68% 30% 7% 1% -
81 JIA Jing Yu 100% 71% 24% 4% - - -
81 EBERMAN Henry 100% 92% 60% 22% 4% - -
84 TESSMAN Henry 100% 94% 69% 33% 9% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.