New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% | |
| 2 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | |
| 3 | VALADEZ Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 3 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% | |
| 5 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 8% | |
| 6 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
| 7 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 8 | SU Emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 9 | RHIE Lena | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 3% | |
| 10 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 11 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
| 12 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | |
| 13 | JIN Olivia P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | O'HARA Eimile J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 15 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 16 | WHEELER Kira | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | |
| 18 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 19 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% | |
| 20 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | 15% | 1% | |
| 21 | OWENS Celine A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% | |
| 22 | ZHANG Rongruo | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 23 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 20% | 1% | |
| 24 | DONG Zihan | 100% | 98% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 26 | TRIBUSH Shayna | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 27 | YU Melinda | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | ROCCA Mary J. | 100% | 97% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | WHALEN Paige C. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | FAY Zoe A. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | ANGKAVANICH Anna | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | MCCARTHY Natalie | 100% | 84% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | ZIMMERMAN Saskia | 100% | 84% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 35 | SULLIVAN Caroline | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | FAUSTINO Emily | 100% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | HORMEL Molly | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.