Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOU Gaven | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 53% |
2 | SUSANTO William | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | |
3 | SIU Max | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
3 | ROPER Griffin | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
5 | LI Jayden | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
6 | KUPERBERG Thomas | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 5% | |
7 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
8 | WU Alexander | - | - | - | < 1% | - | 100% | |
9 | NOVIKOV Yann | - | - | 3% | 18% | 51% | 28% | |
10 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 3% | 24% | 46% | 26% | - | |
11 | TIAN Andy | - | 7% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
12 | HUANG Dalynn | 1% | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | - | |
13 | FANG Ryan | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
14 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
15 | SUN Nathan | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 17% | - | |
16 | CHEN Keegan | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
17 | CAO Joshua | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 49% | 11% |
18 | ZHONG Kingsley | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | |
19 | GENG Vincent | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | ||
20 | ZHAO David | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | ||
21 | DENG Jonathan | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
22 | HAN Jiaren | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 17% | |
23 | HU Weijie | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 5% | |
24 | GLODE Russell | - | - | 1% | 10% | 44% | 44% | |
25 | HU Michael | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
26 | TIAN Dylan | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
27 | BHOSREKAR Som | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
28 | ZHANG Eric | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | ||
29 | LECH Landon | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | ||
30 | DAVE Neil | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
31 | SHINDE Aksh | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | |
32 | LEVKOVICH Avery | 29% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
33 | MCCORMICK Chase | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | |
34 | XU Jaden | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
35 | WONG Maxwell | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
36 | BRADY David | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | ||
37 | ZHENG Vincent | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
38 | SUN Andrew | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
39 | WU Yulen | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
40 | SAVIR Ethan | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
41 | OH Dongha | - | - | < 1% | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
42 | ZHAO Ethan | 32% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | CONNELLY Malcolm | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
43 | PELLERIN Liam | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
45 | BLAIS julian | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
46 | ANDERSON Kai | 35% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
47 | DUAN Desmond | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
48 | SCHNEIDER Aiden | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
49 | TONG Andrew | 27% | 46% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.