Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
2 | TAFOYA Devin D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
3 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | 19% |
3 | GADBURY Logan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
5 | FRIEDMAN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
6 | STEWART Tatijana I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
7 | SYKES Elynor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
8 | SOKOLOVAS Genadijus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% |
9 | AGGELER Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 13% |
10 | LEE Jayden J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 1% |
11 | MUENKE Magnus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 39% | 8% | - |
12 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 4% |
13 | EFE Joshua E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 14% | - |
14 | DANIS Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 33% | |
15 | MARENCIK Miles | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
16 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
17 | EYMAN Hans | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | 4% | |
18 | LONG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - |
19 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | |
20 | BENENSON Hayes | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
21 | SCHMIDT Leonard | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - |
22 | SUN Neo | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
23 | EMERSON Zachary | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
24 | ZHU Riley | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
25 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 78% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
26 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% | 5% |
27 | INGHILTERRA Luca | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
28 | MUENKE Torben | 100% | 84% | 42% | 8% | - | - | - |
29 | SAMARRIPA Max | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | MU Jason | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
31 | HANEY Kimberly M. | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
32 | WYLIE Luke | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
33 | RODRIGUES Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 76% | 17% | 1% | - | |
34 | BEALL Milo M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 19% | 1% |
35 | DAVIDSON James | 100% | 94% | 61% | 17% | 1% | - | - |
36 | LEWIS-RAMIREZ Ben | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
37 | MARTEGANI Enea | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | HOEHLE Stacy A. | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | STOLLSTEIMER Jason | 100% | 64% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | SCHNEIDER Ronan | 100% | 55% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.