San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
2 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 38% |
3 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
3 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
5 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
6 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
7 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 4% | |
7 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 10% | |
9 | KHER Roan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 10% | |
10 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
12 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 8% | |
13 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
14 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
15 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
16 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
17 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 1% |
18 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
19 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
20 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
21 | LO Preston | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
22 | NG Micah | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - |
23 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
24 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 88% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
25 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 13% | |
25 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 88% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
27 | ZUO Ethan | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
28 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
29 | HUSSAIN Ibrahim | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | - |
30 | LI Jett | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
31 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
33 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
34 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
35 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
36 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | |
37 | SUBRAMANIAM Akilesh | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
38 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
39 | HUSSAIN Ismail A. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
40 | CHU Colin | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
41 | SAH Steven | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
42 | MCCORMACK WILCOX Braeden | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
43 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | MIN Lucas | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
45 | CARVAJAL Josmar | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.