Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 64% |
2 | DODIN Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% |
3 | MIDYANY Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
3 | MIKHAIL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
6 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
7 | KIM Doyun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% | |
8 | DANILOV Artur | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
9 | CHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
10 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
11 | THOMAS Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
12 | BORAN Brooks | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
13 | ZHUKOV Egor | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
14 | KIM Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
15 | MEDISETTI Arjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
16 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 2% | |
17 | SHIM Jae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
18 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
19 | ZHANG jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 6% |
20 | MASKIN Mikhail | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
21 | FRIZZELL Kai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
22 | ELLIS, IV Floyd | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
23 | ZHOU Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 3% |
24 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
25 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
26 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
27 | YU Jeremy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
28 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
29 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
30 | FEELY Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
31 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
32 | TANG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
33 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
34 | KIM Siwoo | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
35 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
36 | ZHAO ryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
37 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
38 | YAKHNIS Seth | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
39 | KIM Louie | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
40 | BUTLER Xavier | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
40 | QI Bryan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
42 | WHITE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
43 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
44 | HAM Ian | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
45 | DEVISETTY Sohun | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
46 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
47 | ALPSOY Emir | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
48 | FRY John | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
49 | MILLER Xavier | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
50 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
51 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
52 | BEN-YOSEPH Rafael | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
53 | DING Charlie | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
54 | SON Isaac | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
55 | CHA Aiden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
55 | LEE Taeryum | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
57 | PARK Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
58 | YOU Asher | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
58 | FAYEZ Adam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
60 | YAO Irvine | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
61 | WEI Jayden | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
62 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
63 | BURT Jonathan Parker | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
64 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
65 | KELLY Blair | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
66 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
67 | KABEALO Charles | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
68 | PATEL Yash | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
69 | GAO Guanyi (Jonathan) | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
70 | MAXWELL Taiga | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
71 | SCOTTODIMARCO James | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
72 | SHIM Jaeyoo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 1% |
73 | QU ethan | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
74 | WHITE Leonardo | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
75 | BHATT Shivam | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
76 | YOU Emmanuel | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
77 | KANG Ihan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
78 | CHUNG Daehyun Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
79 | SUK Kwon | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
80 | FEELY Samuel | 100% | 92% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
81 | LEE Eric | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
82 | SCHIFFRIN Jonah | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
83 | KESELMAN Ron | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
84 | CHEN Benjamin | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
85 | CHEN Regis | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
86 | CHONG Eden | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
87 | ZHOU Silvan | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
88 | PATEL Tej | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
89 | GREEN Hudson | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
90 | TUTELMAN Shon | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
91 | AJMERI Mikhail | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 17% | 1% | |
92 | BRADFORD Davis | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
93 | IMBERG Matthew | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
94 | MORET Declan | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
95 | CHONG Nikolai | 100% | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.