Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DYMAR Anna | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 2 | CHO Anya | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 3 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 3 | WANG Chantal | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 5 | CIOBANU Celine | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 6 | DEKERMANJI kate | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 7 | XIONG Alice | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
| 8 | LI Anna | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 9 | ERISMAN Gabriella | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 10 | ZHAO Ellie | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 11 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 12 | YIP Allison | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 13 | KOU Cynthia | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 14 | DU Chloe | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
| 15 | SCHULTZ Sumi | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | XU Aasta | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 17 | WANG Nicole | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
| 18 | LIAO irene | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 19 | FU Shannon | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 44% | 46% |
| 20 | WANG Olivia | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% | |
| 21 | LYNTON Olivia | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 22 | YIN Angelina | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LI Allison | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | FLYNN Kensington | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | WANG Lihong | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 52% | 31% |
| 27 | YU Jiaming | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | LI Carlie | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 29 | MUKKU Emily | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 30 | KIM Vivian | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
| 31 | ARNOLD Evangeline | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 32 | WANG Ailly | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 33 | PARKE Jaime | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 34 | LICHTENFELD Naomi | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 35 | MAENG Gloria | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
| 36 | LYNTON Alexandra | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | DU Chelsea | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 38 | LI Mia | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 39 | SUN Joanna | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | TRUONG Chloe | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | MILLER Grey | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 42 | LEONG Andrea | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 43 | CHU Brianna | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | VOO Evelyn | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | SIU Mila | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 46 | WANG Kercedes Ye | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | REN Ivanka | 2% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | KUSHNERENKO Maiia | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | YOON Claire | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | CHAI Serena | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | YANG Emma | 1% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | MIAO Anthea | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 53 | TAI AMANDA | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | GUO Elena | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 55 | KHOURI Sara | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | KOHLER Chrissy | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | DAI Sophie | 3% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 58 | TRIVULCE Scarlett | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 59 | YANG Nina | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 60 | LUCAS Cynthia | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | POON Eleni | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 62 | KWAK Olivia | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | CHONG Emma | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | KEDAN Carmella | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 65 | MANDAP Natalya | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LEE Layla | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | LUO Xinyue | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | BEATINGO Chelli | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | DEFENSOR Ella | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 70 | WANG Phoebe | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 71 | BREWER Isis | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 72 | VINLUAN Emma | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 73 | YU Elise | 32% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 74 | LA Evelyn | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | YAO Astrid | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.