Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
2 | PRASAD Ankith | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
3 | LIU Alexander | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
3 | PADHYE Siddhant | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
5 | IMREK Samuel A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
6 | GYURE Brayden H. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
7 | DAO Matthew M. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 24% |
8 | FRAY Alexander | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 6% |
9 | KOLBINSKIE Luke T. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
10 | SENNEWALD Frederick A. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
11 | PARKER Riley D. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
12 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
13 | VENKAT Rakesh | 1% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
14 | YOUNG Peyton E. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
15 | KARKI Salyan | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
16 | MUGA Boris | - | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
17 | SHIV Rishi | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
18 | BUHEIS Alexander I. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
19 | AGGARWAL Abhimanyu V. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
20 | PARAKH Darayus | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
21 | SENNEWALD James J. | 6% | 32% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - |
22 | PANAYOTOV Alexander | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
23 | SONG Alexander | 9% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | KHANNA Nikhil | 5% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
25 | THOMAS Harris | 9% | 38% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - |
26 | SONG Branden | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | MONDALA Adrian | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | HESSE Frederick Q. | 52% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
29 | MADHEKAR Krishna | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
30 | TAYLOR William | 16% | 51% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.