Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
| 2 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
| 3 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 3 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 5 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 5 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 7 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% |
| 8 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 16% | |
| 9 | LI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 10 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 11 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
| 12 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 13 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 14 | NOVIKOV Yann | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% |
| 15 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 16 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
| 17 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 18 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 49% | ||
| 19 | LU Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 20 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 21 | LIU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 22 | PAN Howard Haoran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 23 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 24 | ZHENG Lerui | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
| 24 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
| 26 | MURDOCK Koichi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 27 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 28 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 9% | |
| 29 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% |
| 30 | LIN Ziyue | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 32 | YANG Luca | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 33 | FAN Ze Lin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
| 34 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 35 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | WONG Blayke | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 37 | KUBBA Krish | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 38 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 18% | 1% | |
| 39 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 99% | 90% | 43% | 7% | ||
| 40 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 7% |
| 41 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 42 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 43 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
| 44 | KEEGAN Cole | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 45 | SHAW eric | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 46 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 47 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | ZHANG Vincent J | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 50 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | 18% | ||
| 51 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 52 | YANG Crescent | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
| 55 | WU David | 100% | 99% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | QIAN Will | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 3% |
| 57 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 58 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 59 | SUN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 60 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 61 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 62 | KUPERBERG Thomas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 63 | BU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 64 | ZHENG Vincent | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 65 | XU Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 66 | HUA Isaac | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 67 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 68 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 7% | |
| 69 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 5% |
| 70 | SU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 71 | WU Max | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 72 | WANG Jaaziel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 73 | XIE Jayden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 4% | |
| 74 | XU Jonathan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 75 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
| 76 | TIMCHENKO Fiodor | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 12% | 1% | |
| 77 | DAVIDSON Henry | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 78 | WU Yulen | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 79 | ROTH Gavin | 100% | 53% | 7% | - | - | ||
| 79 | YU Adam | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 12% | - | |
| 81 | CHEN Kyler | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 81 | SALEH Yassin | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 83 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 84 | FANG Lionel | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 85 | LIN George | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 86 | YOON Mason | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 86 | DHALIWAL Zorawar Singh | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 88 | BRADY David | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 88 | YU Oliver | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 90 | STABROWSKI Joaquin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 91 | FOMIN Dashiell | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | HONG Thomas | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 93 | LI Eric | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 94 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 95 | PARK Joshua | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 96 | HUANG Anthony | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 98 | GRIFFIN Andrew | 100% | 92% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 99 | POLEBOYINA Aarav | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 100 | SAWANT Sarthak | 100% | 78% | 36% | 7% | - | - | |
| 101 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 102 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 103 | MORALES Tycho | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 104 | LIU Mason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 105 | WONG Maxwell | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 106 | WU Connor | 100% | 98% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 106 | XU Jaden | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 108 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 93% | 55% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 109 | CUI Ryan | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 110 | PELLERIN Liam | 100% | 82% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 112 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 113 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 85% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 114 | FANG Ryan | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 115 | HUDSON Jedidiah | 100% | 65% | 12% | 1% | - | ||
| 116 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 117 | LU Ethan | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 118 | NAYAK Saideep | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 118 | IM Andrew | 100% | 74% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 120 | DEGRYSE Leopold | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 121 | OBAS Logan X. | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 121 | ZHAO Ethan | 100% | 87% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 123 | CAI Max | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 124 | ZHANG Vincent | 100% | 41% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 125 | MADHAVARAPU Arjun | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 125 | MATIYASH Andrew | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 127 | BLAIS Julian | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.